New Zealand's Once-Visionary Accident Compensation Scheme and Australia's Revolutionary Vision in its National Disability Insurance Scheme: A Tale of Two Countries.

New Zealand's "visionary" accident compensation scheme came into force in 1974. Described as "the original sin" of the scheme, eligibility was confined, largely for affordability reasons, to accidental injury, leaving disability from sickness, disease and congenital conditions out in the cold, dependent on much less generous support. The scheme's architect, Justice Owen Woodhouse, intended its eventual extension to all forms of disability, regardless of cause. But repeated attempts to do so have all failed. Nearly 40 years later, it is now New Zealand's turn to look with envy at Australia's revolutionary National Disability Insurance Scheme, a comprehensive scheme that provides support for all forms of disability, regardless of cause. The article traces the forces that aligned resulting in the NDIS, summarises its key elements, and briefly considers its challenges and how its future can best be secured. I argue that the NDIS should inspire the final achievement of Woodhouse's "unfinished business" for the benefit of all New Zealanders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Canadian Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Zealand's Once-Visionary Accident Compensation Scheme and Australia's Revolutionary Vision in its National Disability Insurance Scheme: A Tale of Two Countries.

Joanna Manning
PubMed
Canadian Policy and Governance
article

New Zealand's Once-Visionary Accident Compensation Scheme and Australia's Revolutionary Vision in its National Disability Insurance Scheme: A Tale of Two Countries.

Joanna Manning
article en

Abstract

New Zealand's "visionary" accident compensation scheme came into force in 1974. Described as "the original sin" of the scheme, eligibility was confined, largely for affordability reasons, to accidental injury, leaving disability from sickness, disease and congenital conditions out in the cold, dependent on much less generous support. The scheme's architect, Justice Owen Woodhouse, intended its eventual extension to all forms of disability, regardless of cause. But repeated attempts to do so have all failed. Nearly 40 years later, it is now New Zealand's turn to look with envy at Australia's revolutionary National Disability Insurance Scheme, a comprehensive scheme that provides support for all forms of disability, regardless of cause. The article traces the forces that aligned resulting in the NDIS, summarises its key elements, and briefly considers its challenges and how its future can best be secured. I argue that the NDIS should inspire the final achievement of Woodhouse's "unfinished business" for the benefit of all New Zealanders.

PubMedVol. 31(4)
University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Canadian Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.