Research Cooperation Between Universities and Local Firms: Comparing University Ecosystems in China and the USA

Abstract The academic research systems of China and the USA are characterised by different policies and practices with regards to university-business research cooperation (UBRC). To examine those differences, from the perspective of research-intensive universities, this study’s analytical framework focuses on university research outputs that involve collaboration with local business sector partners. More specifically, university-business co-authored publications with authors from a business enterprise located within a 50 km range of the university’s city of location ( UBRC_50km publications ). The study comprises 193 research-intensive universities in China and 179 in the United States. Regression modelling of each country’s UBRC_50km publication output levels comprise two models: (1) ‘internal’ research profiles of universities; (2) extended model with two ‘external’ variables related to characteristics of the local geographical area. The findings of model 1 show that the two university research systems seem fairly similar in terms of UBRC_50km output patterns. When external explanatory factors are included, some significant differences emerge: in the USA, UBRC_50km output is significantly affected by the total patent output of the local area (i.e. patents of universities and local firms) representing the local R&D system; in China, it’s the number of other large research-intensive universities located in the same city or metropolitan area, thus reflecting the positive effects of urban agglomeration and the local science system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-025-02588-x
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Cooperation Between Universities and Local Firms: Comparing University Ecosystems in China and the USA

Robert Tijssen
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Research Cooperation Between Universities and Local Firms: Comparing University Ecosystems in China and the USA

Robert Tijssen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The academic research systems of China and the USA are characterised by different policies and practices with regards to university-business research cooperation (UBRC). To examine those differences, from the perspective of research-intensive universities, this study’s analytical framework focuses on university research outputs that involve collaboration with local business sector partners. More specifically, university-business co-authored publications with authors from a business enterprise located within a 50 km range of the university’s city of location ( UBRC_50km publications ). The study comprises 193 research-intensive universities in China and 179 in the United States. Regression modelling of each country’s UBRC_50km publication output levels comprise two models: (1) ‘internal’ research profiles of universities; (2) extended model with two ‘external’ variables related to characteristics of the local geographical area. The findings of model 1 show that the two university research systems seem fairly similar in terms of UBRC_50km output patterns. When external explanatory factors are included, some significant differences emerge: in the USA, UBRC_50km output is significantly affected by the total patent output of the local area (i.e. patents of universities and local firms) representing the local R&D system; in China, it’s the number of other large research-intensive universities located in the same city or metropolitan area, thus reflecting the positive effects of urban agglomeration and the local science system.

Journal of the Knowledge EconomyVol. 17(1)
Leiden University (NL), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Yale University, Vanderbilt University, Utah State University, Northwestern University, Washington State University, Universiteit Leiden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tongji University, Universiteit Stellenbosch, Xidian University, Chinese People’s Liberation Army
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.