Four archetypes of organizing corporate foresight at the intermediate maturity stage: A multiple case study

Systematizing corporate foresight and integrating it into decision-making is critical to harness its value. However, many companies face challenges due to limited legitimacy, leading to scarce resources and a lack of commitment. Previous research has paid little attention to various ways to develop foresight capability, particularly at the intermediate stage of foresight maturity, where legitimacy is often lacking. We address this issue by exploring alternative organizing models to demonstrate foresight's value within firms. We conceptualize a corporate foresight system (CFS) comprising structures, roles, and activities for managing futures knowledge. Through a multiple case study of eleven large companies with intermediate foresight maturity, we identify four legitimate CFS archetypes: function-driven, independent foresight unit, executive team-led, and platform-based models. Using 43 semi-structured interviews, a pre-questionnaire survey, and workshops, we characterize these archetypes, examine their strengths and weaknesses and identify ‘windows of opportunity’ for further legitimation by extending and refining an initial CFS. Theoretically, we develop the concept of CFS, identify four CFS archetypes for companies with intermediate foresight maturity, and discuss how they contribute to demonstrating foresight's value within firms. Practically, our findings provide guidance for managers seeking to develop foresight capability by identifying approaches to legitimize foresight within an organization. • Corporate foresight systems (CFS) integrate futures knowledge into decision-making. • Four archetypal CFSs: function-driven, foresight unit, executive team-led, platform-based • Firms at the intermediate maturity stage, adopt different CFSs to drive foresight's legitimation. • Different CFSs have distinct strengths and weaknesses. • Emerging needs offer ‘windows of opportunity’ for further legitimation by extending initial CFSs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124117
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four archetypes of organizing corporate foresight at the intermediate maturity stage: A multiple case study

Sofi Kurki, Matti Pihlajamaa, Pauli Komonen, Juuli Huuhanmäki
2 citations
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
article

Four archetypes of organizing corporate foresight at the intermediate maturity stage: A multiple case study

Sofi Kurki, Matti Pihlajamaa, Pauli Komonen, Juuli Huuhanmäki
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Systematizing corporate foresight and integrating it into decision-making is critical to harness its value. However, many companies face challenges due to limited legitimacy, leading to scarce resources and a lack of commitment. Previous research has paid little attention to various ways to develop foresight capability, particularly at the intermediate stage of foresight maturity, where legitimacy is often lacking. We address this issue by exploring alternative organizing models to demonstrate foresight's value within firms. We conceptualize a corporate foresight system (CFS) comprising structures, roles, and activities for managing futures knowledge. Through a multiple case study of eleven large companies with intermediate foresight maturity, we identify four legitimate CFS archetypes: function-driven, independent foresight unit, executive team-led, and platform-based models. Using 43 semi-structured interviews, a pre-questionnaire survey, and workshops, we characterize these archetypes, examine their strengths and weaknesses and identify ‘windows of opportunity’ for further legitimation by extending and refining an initial CFS. Theoretically, we develop the concept of CFS, identify four CFS archetypes for companies with intermediate foresight maturity, and discuss how they contribute to demonstrating foresight's value within firms. Practically, our findings provide guidance for managers seeking to develop foresight capability by identifying approaches to legitimize foresight within an organization. • Corporate foresight systems (CFS) integrate futures knowledge into decision-making. • Four archetypal CFSs: function-driven, foresight unit, executive team-led, platform-based • Firms at the intermediate maturity stage, adopt different CFSs to drive foresight's legitimation. • Different CFSs have distinct strengths and weaknesses. • Emerging needs offer ‘windows of opportunity’ for further legitimation by extending initial CFSs.

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 215
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Business Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.