Quantifying Soil Gaseous Nitrogen Losses From Nitrification and Denitrification Based on Nitrogen Isotope Model
Abstract Gaseous nitrogen (N) losses from nitrification and denitrification (NO + N 2 O + N 2 ) pathways contribute a significant fraction of the total N losses from cropland ecosystems. The N mass balance and process‐based models are commonly applied to estimate the NO + N 2 O + N 2 losses but have suffered from systematic error accumulations or model over‐parameterization, leading to a large uncertainty in estimation, hindering effective management of the global N budget. Here, we proposed a novel N isotope model, which considers fertilizer, ammonia volatilization and harvest after testing steady‐state assumption of soil δ 15 N and N pool for croplands, and justified if it could be successfully applied to constrain NO + N 2 O + N 2 losses from cropland ecosystems. We compiled the first bulk‐soil δ 15 N data set of 0–30 cm soils ( n = 738) from croplands and produced a global map of cropland soil δ 15 N, which is crucial input data for an isotope model to quantify NO + N 2 O + N 2 losses. The results show that the cropland soil δ 15 N ranges from 3.5 to 9.0‰, with a mean value of 6.6 ± 0.8‰ (mean ± standard deviation). The estimated NO + N 2 O + N 2 losses accounted for an average of 17 ± 9% of N outputs and were 35.86 ± 24.17 kg N ha −1 yr −1 in China's rice paddies, with an increasing trend from Central China to South or North China. The estimations were comparable with the results from observation‐constrained denitrification‐decomposition modeling (38.9 ± 4.8 kg N ha −1 yr −1 ) and in good agreement with experimental observations at site scale ( R 2 = 0.58). Our results suggest that soil N isotopes, as a quantitative tracer, provide a valuable alternative approach to constrain the NO + N 2 O + N 2 losses in croplands at large geographic scales.
Authors
- Xiaohan Cui (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4773-2255)
- Longfei Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2127-6343)
- Yunting Fang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-546X)
- Yan Bo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0041-4196)
- Yihang Duan
- Yiwei Jian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4646-4084)
- Peter Dörsch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-1839)
- Wulahati Adalibieke
- Edith Bai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-6504)
- Benjamin Z. Houlton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-0261)
- Feng Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6122-0611)
- Haoming Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1315-1954)
- Wenxin Ba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2517-5996)
- Chao Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-7505)
- Huayan Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-0412)
Institutions
- Center for Global Development (US)
- Hohai University (CN)
- Northeast Normal University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Beijing Forestry University (CN)
- Institute of Applied Ecology (CN)
- Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN)
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gb008376
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.56
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- National Key Research and Development Program of China