Reproductive females of a cooperatively breeding rodent are in better body condition when living in large groups

Abstract Cooperation and group living have been suggested to facilitate survival in varying environments and under challenging conditions. However, group living may also be associated with costs, particularly in species where individuals within groups may compete for limited resources. The costs and benefits of cooperative group living on cooperatively breeding mammals in varying environments remain unclear. Here, we use data collected from wild, cooperatively breeding Natal mole‐rats ( Cryptomys hottentotus natalensis ) inhabiting a seasonally varying environment to assess whether body condition changes between seasons and whether these changes are contingent upon group size. We demonstrate that the body condition of reproductive females improved with increasing helper number during both the benign summer and the harsher winter seasons. However, the body condition of other group members showed little dependency on group size or season. Only when including one extremely large group did the body condition of non‐breeders weakly, albeit significantly, change depending on group size and seasonality. These results suggest that larger group sizes may yield some benefits for non‐breeding group members during winter and may invoke some costs during summer. Group living in Natal mole‐rats is likely promoted by a combination of collective foraging, thermoregulatory benefits, and potentially some indirect fitness benefits through improved body condition of the breeding female.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Zoology
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.70015
Primary Topic
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive females of a cooperatively breeding rodent are in better body condition when living in large groups

Daniel W. Hart, Nigel C. Bennett, Andries K. Janse van Vuuren, Tobias Süess et al.
Journal of Zoology
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
article

Reproductive females of a cooperatively breeding rodent are in better body condition when living in large groups

Daniel W. Hart, Nigel C. Bennett, Andries K. Janse van Vuuren, Tobias Süess, Markus Zöttl, Kyle T. Finn
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cooperation and group living have been suggested to facilitate survival in varying environments and under challenging conditions. However, group living may also be associated with costs, particularly in species where individuals within groups may compete for limited resources. The costs and benefits of cooperative group living on cooperatively breeding mammals in varying environments remain unclear. Here, we use data collected from wild, cooperatively breeding Natal mole‐rats ( Cryptomys hottentotus natalensis ) inhabiting a seasonally varying environment to assess whether body condition changes between seasons and whether these changes are contingent upon group size. We demonstrate that the body condition of reproductive females improved with increasing helper number during both the benign summer and the harsher winter seasons. However, the body condition of other group members showed little dependency on group size or season. Only when including one extremely large group did the body condition of non‐breeders weakly, albeit significantly, change depending on group size and seasonality. These results suggest that larger group sizes may yield some benefits for non‐breeding group members during winter and may invoke some costs during summer. Group living in Natal mole‐rats is likely promoted by a combination of collective foraging, thermoregulatory benefits, and potentially some indirect fitness benefits through improved body condition of the breeding female.

Journal of ZoologyVol. 326(3)
Linnaeus University (SE), University of Pretoria (ZA)
National Research Foundation, Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.