Tailoring structural and compositional influence on γ‐ray shielding efficiency of Zeolite frameworks

Abstract Zeolites, a class of micro‐porous aluminosilicate minerals, exhibit unique structural and compositional characteristics that make them promising candidates for γ‐ray radiation shielding applications. This study investigates the suitability of selected Zeolite frameworks—Natrolite (NAT), Edingtonite (EDI), and Thomsonite (THO)—and their representative crystals, including Gonnardite, NAT, EDI, Kalborsite, and THO‐Sr. The shielding properties were assessed through their mass attenuation coefficients (MACs), linear attenuation coefficients (LACs), and effective atomic numbers ( Z eff ​s) over photon energy ranges of 0.015‒15.0 MeV. Kalborsite demonstrated superior low‐energy attenuation with a MAC of 10.84 cm 2 /g and a corresponding Z eff ​ of 15.78 at E = 0.015, outperforming other crystals such as EDI ( Z eff = 20.56, MAC = 6.692 cm 2 /g) and Gonnardite ( Z eff = 13.77, MAC = 7.622 cm 2 /g). At high photon energies, Kalborsite retained its advantage with the highest LAC (0.056 cm −1 ) among all samples. These findings highlight the critical influence of Zeolite density, Z eff ​, and SiO 2 ​ composition on their radiation shielding efficiency and demonstrate the potential of optimizing Zeolite frameworks for lightweight, effective shielding materials suitable for medical imaging, nuclear energy, and space exploration applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.20560
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tailoring structural and compositional influence on γ‐ray shielding efficiency of Zeolite frameworks

Z. Y. Khattari
6 citations
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
3.11
article

Tailoring structural and compositional influence on γ‐ray shielding efficiency of Zeolite frameworks

Z. Y. Khattari
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Zeolites, a class of micro‐porous aluminosilicate minerals, exhibit unique structural and compositional characteristics that make them promising candidates for γ‐ray radiation shielding applications. This study investigates the suitability of selected Zeolite frameworks—Natrolite (NAT), Edingtonite (EDI), and Thomsonite (THO)—and their representative crystals, including Gonnardite, NAT, EDI, Kalborsite, and THO‐Sr. The shielding properties were assessed through their mass attenuation coefficients (MACs), linear attenuation coefficients (LACs), and effective atomic numbers ( Z eff ​s) over photon energy ranges of 0.015‒15.0 MeV. Kalborsite demonstrated superior low‐energy attenuation with a MAC of 10.84 cm 2 /g and a corresponding Z eff ​ of 15.78 at E = 0.015, outperforming other crystals such as EDI ( Z eff = 20.56, MAC = 6.692 cm 2 /g) and Gonnardite ( Z eff = 13.77, MAC = 7.622 cm 2 /g). At high photon energies, Kalborsite retained its advantage with the highest LAC (0.056 cm −1 ) among all samples. These findings highlight the critical influence of Zeolite density, Z eff ​, and SiO 2 ​ composition on their radiation shielding efficiency and demonstrate the potential of optimizing Zeolite frameworks for lightweight, effective shielding materials suitable for medical imaging, nuclear energy, and space exploration applications.

Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyVol. 108(8)
Hashemite University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
3.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.