Policies, Assistive Technologies, and Barriers in Inclusive Education: A Global Systematic Review (2019-2024)

Inclusive education aims to guarantee the universal right to equitable and quality education, addressing the structural and contextual barriers that hinder its global implementation. Although educational policies and assistive technologies have facilitated some progress, challenges persist that impede the effective inclusion of students with special educational needs (SEN). To critically analyze how educational policies, assistive technologies, and structural barriers interact in the implementation of inclusive education globally, identifying opportunities and limitations. A systematic literature review was conducted using PRISMA methodology, covering studies published between 2019 and 2024 in the Scopus database. Relevant empirical and theoretical research addresses the interrelations among policies, technologies, and structural barriers in inclusive educational contexts. The findings were grouped into three main categories.1. Assistive technologies, including agile methodologies, artificial intelligence, and educational robotics, have the potential to personalize learning and improve accessibility, albeit with ethical and practical challenges.2. Inclusive educational policies that demonstrate significant progress in some countries face issues of coherence and inequality in their implementation. 3. Structural barriers, such as limited teacher training, regional inequalities, and the coexistence of parallel educational systems, perpetuate exclusion. This study provides a comprehensive and updated view of the dynamics influencing inclusive education, highlighting the need for integrated strategies that combine assistive technologies and coherent policies. It also emphasizes the importance of an intersectoral collaborative approach for overcoming structural barriers and promoting educational equity. To advance toward an inclusive educational system, it is essential to design more equitable policies, ensure teacher training in assistive technologies, and establish regulatory frameworks that ensure ethical implementation. Additionally, fostering collaboration among governments, educational institutions, and technological actrs is recommended to address the structural barriers in diverse contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i2.418
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policies, Assistive Technologies, and Barriers in Inclusive Education: A Global Systematic Review (2019-2024)

Dennisse Guillén-Martínez, Javier Alexander Alcázar-Espinoza, Iván Rámirez-Sánchez, Teresa Samaniego-Cobo et al.
3 citations
Journal of Posthumanism
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
17.32
article

Policies, Assistive Technologies, and Barriers in Inclusive Education: A Global Systematic Review (2019-2024)

Dennisse Guillén-Martínez, Javier Alexander Alcázar-Espinoza, Iván Rámirez-Sánchez, Teresa Samaniego-Cobo, Carolina Villacís-Macias
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Inclusive education aims to guarantee the universal right to equitable and quality education, addressing the structural and contextual barriers that hinder its global implementation. Although educational policies and assistive technologies have facilitated some progress, challenges persist that impede the effective inclusion of students with special educational needs (SEN). To critically analyze how educational policies, assistive technologies, and structural barriers interact in the implementation of inclusive education globally, identifying opportunities and limitations. A systematic literature review was conducted using PRISMA methodology, covering studies published between 2019 and 2024 in the Scopus database. Relevant empirical and theoretical research addresses the interrelations among policies, technologies, and structural barriers in inclusive educational contexts. The findings were grouped into three main categories.1. Assistive technologies, including agile methodologies, artificial intelligence, and educational robotics, have the potential to personalize learning and improve accessibility, albeit with ethical and practical challenges.2. Inclusive educational policies that demonstrate significant progress in some countries face issues of coherence and inequality in their implementation. 3. Structural barriers, such as limited teacher training, regional inequalities, and the coexistence of parallel educational systems, perpetuate exclusion. This study provides a comprehensive and updated view of the dynamics influencing inclusive education, highlighting the need for integrated strategies that combine assistive technologies and coherent policies. It also emphasizes the importance of an intersectoral collaborative approach for overcoming structural barriers and promoting educational equity. To advance toward an inclusive educational system, it is essential to design more equitable policies, ensure teacher training in assistive technologies, and establish regulatory frameworks that ensure ethical implementation. Additionally, fostering collaboration among governments, educational institutions, and technological actrs is recommended to address the structural barriers in diverse contexts.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(2)
Universidad Estatal de Milagro (EC), Universidad Agraria del Ecuador (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
17.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.