Use of camera traps to record wild red panda activity in eastern Nepal

Abstract Behavior of wild red panda ( Ailurus fulgens ) is not well‐studied, as it is difficult to locate and track individuals. Previous studies of red panda behavior have involved direct observations, finding fecal scats, and GPS collar deployment. We assessed the value of using camera traps to monitor wild red panda, evaluating the utility of placing cameras on the ground or in trees. Our study used data from 19 pairs of camera traps, set in eastern Nepal for at least a month during 2018, to monitor and compare their effectiveness for capturing wild red panda behavior at ground level and in the tree canopy. Arboreal camera traps were 8 times more effective than ground‐based cameras at capturing red pandas and their behavior in terms of frequency. Arboreal camera traps also captured images with enough clarity to distinguish facial markings between individuals and provide potential for future mark‐recapture approaches. Despite the extra set‐up difficulties and higher rate of misfires, researchers should place camera traps in tree canopies at around 5 m height for specific red panda monitoring events, including presence, activity patterns, behavior, and possible predator presence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1583
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of camera traps to record wild red panda activity in eastern Nepal

Adrian M. Paterson, Kathryn A. Bugler, James G. Ross, Sonam Tashi Lama
1 links
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Use of camera traps to record wild red panda activity in eastern Nepal

Adrian M. Paterson, Kathryn A. Bugler, James G. Ross, Sonam Tashi Lama
article en

Abstract

Abstract Behavior of wild red panda ( Ailurus fulgens ) is not well‐studied, as it is difficult to locate and track individuals. Previous studies of red panda behavior have involved direct observations, finding fecal scats, and GPS collar deployment. We assessed the value of using camera traps to monitor wild red panda, evaluating the utility of placing cameras on the ground or in trees. Our study used data from 19 pairs of camera traps, set in eastern Nepal for at least a month during 2018, to monitor and compare their effectiveness for capturing wild red panda behavior at ground level and in the tree canopy. Arboreal camera traps were 8 times more effective than ground‐based cameras at capturing red pandas and their behavior in terms of frequency. Arboreal camera traps also captured images with enough clarity to distinguish facial markings between individuals and provide potential for future mark‐recapture approaches. Despite the extra set‐up difficulties and higher rate of misfires, researchers should place camera traps in tree canopies at around 5 m height for specific red panda monitoring events, including presence, activity patterns, behavior, and possible predator presence.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(2)
Lincoln University (NZ)
Lincoln University
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.