Efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

Despite numerous studies on second-line therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer, there is no randomized study evaluating the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as a second-line treatment. This study aims to examine the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in second-line therapy. In this retrospective study, a total of 218 patients from 23 centers were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), treatment efficacy based on ECOG performance status (PS), and tumor marker (CEA, CA 19 - 9) levels. In the second-line treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, the median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 7.1), and the median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 10.0). Median PFS was 6.6 months in patients with normal CEA levels compared to 4.4 months in patients with high CEA levels (P = 0.01). Median PFS was 6 months in patients with ECOG PS 0-1 compared to 3.8 months in patients with PS 2 (P < 0.01). This study demonstrates the contribution of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in both OS and PFS in second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. It was found to be a good option especially for young patients with good ECOG PS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96157-6
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

Oğur Karhan, Mustafa Özgür Arıcı, Hacer Demir, Ahmet Ufuk Kömüroğlu et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
5.23
article

Efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

Oğur Karhan, Mustafa Özgür Arıcı, Hacer Demir, Ahmet Ufuk Kömüroğlu, Talat Aykut, Mehmet Zeki Erdem, Bilgin Demir, Nargız Majidova, Ali Alper Solmaz, Yasin Sezgin, Semiha Urvay, Burcu Ulaş Kahya, Abdurrahman Bicer, İbrahim Aydın, Sedat Yıldız, İlkay Gültürk, Mehmet Nuri Başer, Muslih Ürün, Yakup Ergün, Mürsel Salı, Mustafa Yıldırım, Musa Barış Aykan, Mehmet Naci Aldemir, Halis Yerlikaya, Mustafa Gürbüz, Murat Araz, Melike Özçelik, Müge Sönmez, Sezai Tunç, Zuhat Urakçı, Berrak Mermit Erçek, Sinem Akbaş, Serdar İleri, Abdullah Sakin, Hayati Arvas, Savaş Gökçek, Hicran Anık, Mirmehdi Mehtıyev, Nilüfer Avcı, Esra Özen, Mehmet Emin Kalender, Ali Alkan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Despite numerous studies on second-line therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer, there is no randomized study evaluating the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as a second-line treatment. This study aims to examine the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in second-line therapy. In this retrospective study, a total of 218 patients from 23 centers were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), treatment efficacy based on ECOG performance status (PS), and tumor marker (CEA, CA 19 - 9) levels. In the second-line treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, the median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 7.1), and the median OS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 10.0). Median PFS was 6.6 months in patients with normal CEA levels compared to 4.4 months in patients with high CEA levels (P = 0.01). Median PFS was 6 months in patients with ECOG PS 0-1 compared to 3.8 months in patients with PS 2 (P < 0.01). This study demonstrates the contribution of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in both OS and PFS in second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. It was found to be a good option especially for young patients with good ECOG PS.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Sakarya University (TR), Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR), Dicle University (TR), Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Izmir University (TR), Koç University (TR), Bilkent University (TR), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Fatih University Medical Faculty Hospital (TR), Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi (TR), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR), Sivas State Hospital (TR), Ankara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Education Training And Research (US), Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Istanbul Eye Hospital (TR), Afyon Kocatepe University (TR), Istanbul University (TR), Marmara University (TR), Adnan Menderes University (TR), Muğla University (TR), Harran University (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
5.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.