Systematic Imaging Evaluation and Reporting of Primary Bone Tumor using BTI-RADS

• Background: To is to define the main imaging features to differentiate between benign and malignant primary bone tumors and to determine efficacy of the new systemic approach (BTI-RADS) in bone tumor stratification and its role in enabling radiologists to communicate results to the referring physician clearly and consistently. • Methods: A cross-section study From November 2021 to December 2023, it included 36 patients referred from orthopedics department to radio-diagnosis department to assess a preliminary diagnosed primary focal bony lesion, all of them were evaluated with X-ray, CT and MRI. • Results: We applied our study on 36 patients (23 men and 13 women; age range, 10 - 70 years).and we found a good agreement between BTI-RADS and gold standard results (K=0.658). The value was highly significant (P value <0.001).BTI-RADS agreed with gold standard results in (90%) true malignant cases and (75%) of true benign cases, while there were (25%) false negative cases (diagnosed as benign lesions by BTI-RADS but were proven to be malignant by histopathology) and (10%) false positive cases (diagnosed as malignant masses by BTI-RADS but were proven to be benign by histopathology). • Conclusion A systematic, evidence-based classification method is proposed, which reliably stratifies bone lesions into four groups based on their malignancy risk. This approach is reproducible across varying levels of reader expertise and aims to standardize bone tumor evaluations, potentially improving patient management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2025.361202.3844
Primary Topic
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Imaging Evaluation and Reporting of Primary Bone Tumor using BTI-RADS

Ahmed Mohammad Alaa, Heba Fathy Tantawy, yousra F. Tantawy
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
article

Systematic Imaging Evaluation and Reporting of Primary Bone Tumor using BTI-RADS

Ahmed Mohammad Alaa, Heba Fathy Tantawy, yousra F. Tantawy
article en

Abstract

• Background: To is to define the main imaging features to differentiate between benign and malignant primary bone tumors and to determine efficacy of the new systemic approach (BTI-RADS) in bone tumor stratification and its role in enabling radiologists to communicate results to the referring physician clearly and consistently. • Methods: A cross-section study From November 2021 to December 2023, it included 36 patients referred from orthopedics department to radio-diagnosis department to assess a preliminary diagnosed primary focal bony lesion, all of them were evaluated with X-ray, CT and MRI. • Results: We applied our study on 36 patients (23 men and 13 women; age range, 10 - 70 years).and we found a good agreement between BTI-RADS and gold standard results (K=0.658). The value was highly significant (P value <0.001).BTI-RADS agreed with gold standard results in (90%) true malignant cases and (75%) of true benign cases, while there were (25%) false negative cases (diagnosed as benign lesions by BTI-RADS but were proven to be malignant by histopathology) and (10%) false positive cases (diagnosed as malignant masses by BTI-RADS but were proven to be benign by histopathology). • Conclusion A systematic, evidence-based classification method is proposed, which reliably stratifies bone lesions into four groups based on their malignancy risk. This approach is reproducible across varying levels of reader expertise and aims to standardize bone tumor evaluations, potentially improving patient management.

Zagazig University Medical JournalVol. 0(0)
Zagazig University (EG), Helwan University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.