Does Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Improve Outcomes for Patients with Undifferentiated Hypotension in Emergency Intensive Care Unit ?

Background: Early recognition management of hypotension reduce mortality, with point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) Rapid Ultrasound in Shock Hypotension (RUSH) protocol. This study aimed to assess effect of using of point-of-care ultrasonography protocol in patients with undifferentiated hypotension on survival outcomes in emergency intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial that was conducted on 100 adult patients who presented to Emergency ICU with undifferentiated, non-traumatic hypotension, or shock. The studied cases were randomly allocated into 2 groups (50 cases with POCUS 50 matched control group). The study&#039;s primary outcomes included mortality incidence, 30-day survival, hospital discharge rates. Secondary outcomes assess ICU/hospital stay duration, need for mechanical ventilation (MV), use of vasoinotropes fluids, CT scan rates, dialysis requirements. Results: The use of POCUS significantly improved early diagnosis time (1.52±0.50 vs. 9.46±2.24 hours, p<0.001), reduced ICU stay (6.02±1.25 vs. 7.56±1.80 days, p<0.001), and decreased total IV fluid administration (9300 vs. 11000 mL, p=0.004) compared to control group. The POCUS group had higher systolic (114.10±3.45 vs. 112.30±4.42 mmHg, p=0.014), diastolic (65.40±4.27 vs. 61.70±2.39 mmHg, p<0.001), mean arterial pressures (81.54±3.38 vs. 78.39±2.33 mmHg, p<0.001) after 60 minutes. Mechanical ventilation duration was shorter in POCUS group (p<0.001). The CT scan use was lower in the POCUS group (20% vs. 48%, p=0.003). Conclusion: Implementing POCUS protocol in emergency ICU for adult patients with undifferentiated, non-traumatic hypotension or shock significantly improved patient outcomes. POCUS reduced mean hospital discharge time, ICU length of stay, median IV fluid administration compared to the control group

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2025.362494.3853
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Improve Outcomes for Patients with Undifferentiated Hypotension in Emergency Intensive Care Unit ?

F. Ahmed, Menna-allah Gamal Abd-elaty Mohamed, Essamedin Mamdouh Negm, Samya Abdelrahman El-Wakeel
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Does Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Improve Outcomes for Patients with Undifferentiated Hypotension in Emergency Intensive Care Unit ?

F. Ahmed, Menna-allah Gamal Abd-elaty Mohamed, Essamedin Mamdouh Negm, Samya Abdelrahman El-Wakeel
article en

Abstract

Background: Early recognition management of hypotension reduce mortality, with point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) Rapid Ultrasound in Shock Hypotension (RUSH) protocol. This study aimed to assess effect of using of point-of-care ultrasonography protocol in patients with undifferentiated hypotension on survival outcomes in emergency intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial that was conducted on 100 adult patients who presented to Emergency ICU with undifferentiated, non-traumatic hypotension, or shock. The studied cases were randomly allocated into 2 groups (50 cases with POCUS 50 matched control group). The study&#039;s primary outcomes included mortality incidence, 30-day survival, hospital discharge rates. Secondary outcomes assess ICU/hospital stay duration, need for mechanical ventilation (MV), use of vasoinotropes fluids, CT scan rates, dialysis requirements. Results: The use of POCUS significantly improved early diagnosis time (1.52±0.50 vs. 9.46±2.24 hours, p<0.001), reduced ICU stay (6.02±1.25 vs. 7.56±1.80 days, p<0.001), and decreased total IV fluid administration (9300 vs. 11000 mL, p=0.004) compared to control group. The POCUS group had higher systolic (114.10±3.45 vs. 112.30±4.42 mmHg, p=0.014), diastolic (65.40±4.27 vs. 61.70±2.39 mmHg, p<0.001), mean arterial pressures (81.54±3.38 vs. 78.39±2.33 mmHg, p<0.001) after 60 minutes. Mechanical ventilation duration was shorter in POCUS group (p<0.001). The CT scan use was lower in the POCUS group (20% vs. 48%, p=0.003). Conclusion: Implementing POCUS protocol in emergency ICU for adult patients with undifferentiated, non-traumatic hypotension or shock significantly improved patient outcomes. POCUS reduced mean hospital discharge time, ICU length of stay, median IV fluid administration compared to the control group

Zagazig University Medical JournalVol. 0(0)
Zagazig University (EG), National Heart Institute (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.