Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum Block Against Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a very frequent surgical procedure with notable postoperative pain and discomfort. Both QLB and ESPB techniques have somatic and visceral analgesia. These interventions could be integrated into a multimodal analgesia strategy in sleeve gastrectomy surgeries.Objective: This study aimed to assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy of quadratus Lumborum block against erector spinae plane block in sleeve gastrectomy operations.Patients and Methods: This randomized prospective experiment had 92 people who were randomly assigned to have elective sleeve gastrectomy. They were randomly assigned to two groups of equivalent sizes [46 patients in each]. The initial group received QLB. The second group received ESPB.Results: The findings revealed no statistically significant difference in postoperative morphine consumption over a 24-hour period between the two groups [5.35 ± 2.19 mg in QLB versus 5.48 ± 2.17 mg in ESPB, p = 0.775], as well as in postoperative VAS scores and the timing of the initial request for rescue analgesia. Both techniques alleviated the stress response during trocar insertion and abdominal insufflation.Conclusion: The Quadratus Lumborum block [QLB] and Erector Spinae Plane block [ESPB] can be employed to reduce postoperative pain in sleeve gastrectomy surgeries, as they efficiently address both somatic and visceral pain components.
Authors
- Hani Gharib Ali
- Mohammad Salama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-9810)
- Adel Ali Hassan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8098-2069)
- Ahmed Mehrez Gad
- Tamer Ahmed Abdelmonem Abdelsalam
- Hatem Mahmoud Elkenany
Institutions
- Al-Azhar University (EG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Medical Arts
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.21608/ijma.2025.361842.2133
- Primary Topic
- Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00