Drivers of persistent changes in the global methane cycle under aggressive mitigation action

To achieve the Paris climate agreement goals, methane (CH4) emission mitigation plays a key role. Therefore, a better understanding of the global methane cycle is indispensable. Here we simulate the global methane cycle fully interactively from 1850 to 2100 with a strong mitigation action scenario (SSP1-2.6) post 2014. We show that the atmospheric methane burden largely recovers to early 20th-century levels, while wetland methane emissions follow a persistent upward trend from 166 Tg(CH4) yr–1 at pre-industrial to 221 Tg(CH4) yr–1 in 2100. The methane lifetime decreases from 9.3 to 7.3 years over the 1850–2100 period. We identify net primary productivity as the main driver behind the wetland methane trend with R2 = 0.7. This implies that important components of the methane cycle (wetland methane, methane lifetime) are subject to Earth system feedbacks, potentially impacting any prospective methane mitigation action. Therefore, methane mitigation strategies will need to consider feedbacks in the Earth system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00867-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers of persistent changes in the global methane cycle under aggressive mitigation action

Chris Jones, Gerd Folberth, Paul T. Griffiths, Nicola Gedney et al.
4 citations
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
article

Drivers of persistent changes in the global methane cycle under aggressive mitigation action

Chris Jones, Gerd Folberth, Paul T. Griffiths, Nicola Gedney, Fiona M. O’Connor, Andy Wiltshire
article en
4 citations

Abstract

To achieve the Paris climate agreement goals, methane (CH4) emission mitigation plays a key role. Therefore, a better understanding of the global methane cycle is indispensable. Here we simulate the global methane cycle fully interactively from 1850 to 2100 with a strong mitigation action scenario (SSP1-2.6) post 2014. We show that the atmospheric methane burden largely recovers to early 20th-century levels, while wetland methane emissions follow a persistent upward trend from 166 Tg(CH4) yr–1 at pre-industrial to 221 Tg(CH4) yr–1 in 2100. The methane lifetime decreases from 9.3 to 7.3 years over the 1850–2100 period. We identify net primary productivity as the main driver behind the wetland methane trend with R2 = 0.7. This implies that important components of the methane cycle (wetland methane, methane lifetime) are subject to Earth system feedbacks, potentially impacting any prospective methane mitigation action. Therefore, methane mitigation strategies will need to consider feedbacks in the Earth system.

npj Climate and Atmospheric ScienceVol. 8(1)
Met Office (GB), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), University of Exeter (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Bristol (GB), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Drivers of persistent changes in the global methane cycle under aggressive mitigation action — Chris Jones, Gerd Folberth, et al. · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS