Digital Forensic Analysis of Tooth Wear in Prehistoric and Modern Humans

In this study, we aimed to identify prehistoric and modern humans on the basis of the shape and texture of occlusal surfaces of their molars. Twelve specimens were tested (6 in each group). We used surface plot and plot profile analysis in the first experiment, and also three-dimensional (3D) surface plots, facet orientation, and roughness calculations in the second experiment, to test the deviation of the top gray or surface peak with fossa or surface valley and also bottom gray. Calculations from the three regions of interest indicate that the deviation results from prehistoric human teeth are smaller than those from modern human teeth. The calculated indices of molar surface roughness of prehistoric humans are generally lower than those of modern humans. The findings demonstrate that prehistoric human teeth were a bit more worn than modern human teeth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2025.53.1.145-154
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Forensic Analysis of Tooth Wear in Prehistoric and Modern Humans

Rahardian Wicaksono, Imam Yuadi, Toetik Koesbardiati, K. Gurushankar et al.
Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Digital Forensic Analysis of Tooth Wear in Prehistoric and Modern Humans

Rahardian Wicaksono, Imam Yuadi, Toetik Koesbardiati, K. Gurushankar, Khoirun Nisa’
article en

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to identify prehistoric and modern humans on the basis of the shape and texture of occlusal surfaces of their molars. Twelve specimens were tested (6 in each group). We used surface plot and plot profile analysis in the first experiment, and also three-dimensional (3D) surface plots, facet orientation, and roughness calculations in the second experiment, to test the deviation of the top gray or surface peak with fossa or surface valley and also bottom gray. Calculations from the three regions of interest indicate that the deviation results from prehistoric human teeth are smaller than those from modern human teeth. The calculated indices of molar surface roughness of prehistoric humans are generally lower than those of modern humans. The findings demonstrate that prehistoric human teeth were a bit more worn than modern human teeth.

Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of EurasiaVol. 53(1)
South Ural State University (RU), Universitas Airlangga (ID), Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Forensic Analysis of Tooth Wear in Prehistoric and Modern Humans — Rahardian Wicaksono, Imam Yuadi, et al. · Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS