Do Exercise Pattern and Intensity Influence Affective and Enjoyment Responses in Active Adults? A Secondary Analysis

The purpose of the present study was to compare the ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), affective (Feeling Scale), and remembered enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) responses following different exercise intensities/patterns and to investigate possible associations with physiological parameters in active adults. In a randomized crossover trial, 16 active adults (29.9 ± 3.2 years; 8 males/8 females) performed three different conditions: moderate continuous exercise (MCE) at 70% lactate threshold (LT), heavy continuous exercise (HCE) at 10% of the difference between LT and VO<sub>2</sub> peak, and heavy interval exercise (HIE) wherein intensity matched HCE but performed as 1-minute on:off with stationary rest in between. RPE (CR10) and affect were evaluated during exercise while remembered enjoyment was assessed at the end of each exercise session. Average RPE was significantly different (<i>p</i> = .001; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .744) between all three exercise modalities (MCE = 2.6 ± 0.8, HCE = 5.1 ± 1.0; HIE = 3.5 ± 0.9; <i>p</i> ≤.001). Average affect during exercise was also significantly different (<i>p</i> = .001; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .427) with post hoc testing revealing lower affect for HCE compared to MCE (<i>p</i> = .002) and HIE (<i>p</i> = .008). Similar results were observed for affect nadir (lowest affect during exercise; MCE = 3.1 ± 1.3; HCE = 1.2 ± 1.7; HIE = 2.4 ± 1.6; <i>p</i> = .001; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .470). Remembered enjoyment was not statistically different between modalities (MCE = 98 ± 18; HCE = 96 ± 17; HIE = 100 ± 16; <i>p</i> = .468; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .049), but more people preferred HCE (10/16; 62.5%) compared with both HIE (4/16; 25%) and MCE (2/16; 12.5%) (<i>p</i> = .039): Despite the higher average RPE and lower affect during HCE, no difference was observed for remembered exercise enjoyment, and active individuals seem to prefer this exercise modality compared with HIE or MCE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2471880
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Exercise Pattern and Intensity Influence Affective and Enjoyment Responses in Active Adults? A Secondary Analysis

Jonathan P. Little, Garett S. Jackson, Hashim Islam, Alexis Marcotte‐Chénard
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Physical Activity and Health
article

Do Exercise Pattern and Intensity Influence Affective and Enjoyment Responses in Active Adults? A Secondary Analysis

Jonathan P. Little, Garett S. Jackson, Hashim Islam, Alexis Marcotte‐Chénard
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), affective (Feeling Scale), and remembered enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) responses following different exercise intensities/patterns and to investigate possible associations with physiological parameters in active adults. In a randomized crossover trial, 16 active adults (29.9 ± 3.2 years; 8 males/8 females) performed three different conditions: moderate continuous exercise (MCE) at 70% lactate threshold (LT), heavy continuous exercise (HCE) at 10% of the difference between LT and VO<sub>2</sub> peak, and heavy interval exercise (HIE) wherein intensity matched HCE but performed as 1-minute on:off with stationary rest in between. RPE (CR10) and affect were evaluated during exercise while remembered enjoyment was assessed at the end of each exercise session. Average RPE was significantly different (<i>p</i> = .001; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .744) between all three exercise modalities (MCE = 2.6 ± 0.8, HCE = 5.1 ± 1.0; HIE = 3.5 ± 0.9; <i>p</i> ≤.001). Average affect during exercise was also significantly different (<i>p</i> = .001; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .427) with post hoc testing revealing lower affect for HCE compared to MCE (<i>p</i> = .002) and HIE (<i>p</i> = .008). Similar results were observed for affect nadir (lowest affect during exercise; MCE = 3.1 ± 1.3; HCE = 1.2 ± 1.7; HIE = 2.4 ± 1.6; <i>p</i> = .001; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .470). Remembered enjoyment was not statistically different between modalities (MCE = 98 ± 18; HCE = 96 ± 17; HIE = 100 ± 16; <i>p</i> = .468; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = .049), but more people preferred HCE (10/16; 62.5%) compared with both HIE (4/16; 25%) and MCE (2/16; 12.5%) (<i>p</i> = .039): Despite the higher average RPE and lower affect during HCE, no difference was observed for remembered exercise enjoyment, and active individuals seem to prefer this exercise modality compared with HIE or MCE.

Research Quarterly for Exercise and SportVol. 96(4)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA), Okanagan University College (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.