The Relevance of Team Processes for Different Task Characteristics during Performance Episodes and Over Time in Astronaut Crews and Their Support Teams

Teams working in spaceflight missions belong to the group of extreme teams, as ineffective performance can have serious consequences. Thus, research focuses on understanding team (transition, action, and interpersonal) processes of those teams and their influence on performance. This study investigates the development of team processes in tasks incorporating different task characteristics (generate, choose, negotiate, and execute tasks) on two temporal dimensions (short-term and long-term) in two teams—analog astronauts (AAs) = stable throughout mission and the Mission Support Centre (MSC) = fluctuating members throughout mission—during a four-week analog Mars mission. There were six performance episodes, each incorporating one task that represents one task characteristic, which both teams had to work on within their own team. Video recordings of the performance episodes were used to descriptively evaluate the team processes of each team using the Communication Analysis Tool. Results demonstrate that depending on the task characteristic and the timing during a given performance episode, AAs and the MSC display similar but also contrasting short-term patterns in their team processes, providing insights into which processes are crucial for achieving high performance when considering a particular task characteristic. Long-term, AAs used action processes more often, whereas the MSC implemented transition processes more frequently. This indicates that AAs move to operational work quickly, since their team is stable and they know each other, whereas the MSC needs to find common ground first as the team is fluctuating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human performance in extreme environments
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/2327-2937.1167
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Space Exploration and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relevance of Team Processes for Different Task Characteristics during Performance Episodes and Over Time in Astronaut Crews and Their Support Teams

Christiane Heinicke, Florian E. Klonek, Lara Watermann, Vera Hagemann
1 citations
Human performance in extreme environments
Space Exploration and Technology
4.99
article

The Relevance of Team Processes for Different Task Characteristics during Performance Episodes and Over Time in Astronaut Crews and Their Support Teams

Christiane Heinicke, Florian E. Klonek, Lara Watermann, Vera Hagemann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Teams working in spaceflight missions belong to the group of extreme teams, as ineffective performance can have serious consequences. Thus, research focuses on understanding team (transition, action, and interpersonal) processes of those teams and their influence on performance. This study investigates the development of team processes in tasks incorporating different task characteristics (generate, choose, negotiate, and execute tasks) on two temporal dimensions (short-term and long-term) in two teams—analog astronauts (AAs) = stable throughout mission and the Mission Support Centre (MSC) = fluctuating members throughout mission—during a four-week analog Mars mission. There were six performance episodes, each incorporating one task that represents one task characteristic, which both teams had to work on within their own team. Video recordings of the performance episodes were used to descriptively evaluate the team processes of each team using the Communication Analysis Tool. Results demonstrate that depending on the task characteristic and the timing during a given performance episode, AAs and the MSC display similar but also contrasting short-term patterns in their team processes, providing insights into which processes are crucial for achieving high performance when considering a particular task characteristic. Long-term, AAs used action processes more often, whereas the MSC implemented transition processes more frequently. This indicates that AAs move to operational work quickly, since their team is stable and they know each other, whereas the MSC needs to find common ground first as the team is fluctuating.

Human performance in extreme environmentsVol. 20(1)
Hochschule Bremen (DE), University of Bremen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Space Exploration and Technology
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.