Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Methods for Weather Prediction: A Performance Analysis

Weather classification is crucial in various sectors, including agriculture, transportation, and disaster management. Accurate weather prediction can help mitigate risks and improve decision-making in these fields. However, classifying weather conditions remains challenging due to the complex and dynamic nature of meteorological data. This study aims to compare different machine learning classification methods to determine the most effective model for weather classification. The research employs a structured methodology consisting of seven key steps: literature study, data understanding, exploratory data analysis, data preparation, modeling, evaluation, and hyperparameter tuning. The study used Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, and Extra Trees to identify the best-performing classifier. Model evaluation was conducted using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results indicate that Gradient Boosting achieved the highest performance, surpassing other models with an accuracy of 90.15%. To optimize the model further, hyperparameter tuning was conducted using GridSearchCV, and feature selection was done using SelectKBest. This process resulted in an improved accuracy of 90.22%, demonstrating the effectiveness of model optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Teknologi Terapan G-Tech
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70609/gtech.v9i2.6649
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Methods for Weather Prediction: A Performance Analysis

Ashafidz Fauzan Dianta, Kevin Ilham Apriandy, Zakha Maisat Eka Darmawan, Oktavia Citra Resmi Rachmawati et al.
Jurnal Teknologi Terapan G-Tech
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
article

Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Methods for Weather Prediction: A Performance Analysis

Ashafidz Fauzan Dianta, Kevin Ilham Apriandy, Zakha Maisat Eka Darmawan, Oktavia Citra Resmi Rachmawati, Kholid Fathoni
article en

Abstract

Weather classification is crucial in various sectors, including agriculture, transportation, and disaster management. Accurate weather prediction can help mitigate risks and improve decision-making in these fields. However, classifying weather conditions remains challenging due to the complex and dynamic nature of meteorological data. This study aims to compare different machine learning classification methods to determine the most effective model for weather classification. The research employs a structured methodology consisting of seven key steps: literature study, data understanding, exploratory data analysis, data preparation, modeling, evaluation, and hyperparameter tuning. The study used Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, and Extra Trees to identify the best-performing classifier. Model evaluation was conducted using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results indicate that Gradient Boosting achieved the highest performance, surpassing other models with an accuracy of 90.15%. To optimize the model further, hyperparameter tuning was conducted using GridSearchCV, and feature selection was done using SelectKBest. This process resulted in an improved accuracy of 90.22%, demonstrating the effectiveness of model optimization.

Jurnal Teknologi Terapan G-TechVol. 9(2)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID), Universitas Tamansiswa Padang (ID), Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.