A Systems Thinking Approach to Nuclear Pedagogy and Workforce Development

ABSTRACT Nuclear technology's controversial status has been shaped by its early use in military applications, fear driven by high‐profile accidents, and unresolved waste management challenges. There have, on the other hand, been periodic claims that a “nuclear renaissance” is imminent, driven by different dynamics at different times, most recently related to growing energy demands and increasing concern over carbon emissions. In this article, we respond to urgent calls for more nuclear engineers, resulting from the latest rallying cry around nuclear energy, by reframing the problem using a systems thinking approach that illuminates new pathways for nuclear workforce development via interdisciplinary pedagogies. By building nuclear education into a wide variety of disciplines, we argue, the nuclear workforce could become more resilient to ebbs and flows in energy markets and public opinion. Widening nuclear education beyond nuclear engineers could also reduce the isolation and compartmentalization that has limited the possibilities of nuclear technology. We show how growing and diversifying the overall nuclear workforce could create a wide variety of career opportunities outside STEM and enable greater specialization within STEM, since nuclear engineers and other specialists could be freed up to focus on technological and infrastructural innovations. We argue that interventions into nuclear education should establish new connections and applications of the nuclear sciences in diverse areas of expertise to develop a broad range of professionals who can contribute to a more stable nuclear workforce, bringing what we call “critical and creative nuclear energy literacies” to long‐standing and systemic challenges around nuclear energy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jci3.12040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systems Thinking Approach to Nuclear Pedagogy and Workforce Development

Emily Liu, Brandon Costelloe‐Kuehn, James Olson, In Woo Kim et al.
1 citations
Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
0.52
article

A Systems Thinking Approach to Nuclear Pedagogy and Workforce Development

Emily Liu, Brandon Costelloe‐Kuehn, James Olson, In Woo Kim, Daniel A. González‐Rueda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nuclear technology's controversial status has been shaped by its early use in military applications, fear driven by high‐profile accidents, and unresolved waste management challenges. There have, on the other hand, been periodic claims that a “nuclear renaissance” is imminent, driven by different dynamics at different times, most recently related to growing energy demands and increasing concern over carbon emissions. In this article, we respond to urgent calls for more nuclear engineers, resulting from the latest rallying cry around nuclear energy, by reframing the problem using a systems thinking approach that illuminates new pathways for nuclear workforce development via interdisciplinary pedagogies. By building nuclear education into a wide variety of disciplines, we argue, the nuclear workforce could become more resilient to ebbs and flows in energy markets and public opinion. Widening nuclear education beyond nuclear engineers could also reduce the isolation and compartmentalization that has limited the possibilities of nuclear technology. We show how growing and diversifying the overall nuclear workforce could create a wide variety of career opportunities outside STEM and enable greater specialization within STEM, since nuclear engineers and other specialists could be freed up to focus on technological and infrastructural innovations. We argue that interventions into nuclear education should establish new connections and applications of the nuclear sciences in diverse areas of expertise to develop a broad range of professionals who can contribute to a more stable nuclear workforce, bringing what we call “critical and creative nuclear energy literacies” to long‐standing and systemic challenges around nuclear energy.

Journal of Critical Infrastructure PolicyVol. 6(2)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.