Environmental innovation and corporate financial performance: the moderating role of greenwashing

Purpose With growing global pressure for businesses to adopt sustainable practices, understanding the interplay between genuine environmental efforts and deceptive greenwashing is critical for fostering both ecological integrity and economic success. This study aims to investigate the intricate relationship between environmental innovation (EI), greenwashing (GW) and corporate financial performance (CFP) in Chinese enterprises. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes data from Chinese enterprises spanning 2008 to 2022. By employing a meticulously developed measure of EI and GW, alongside a robust methodological framework, the research establishes a strong and conclusive connection between EI and CFP policy. Findings This study finds that EI reduces financing constraints, which in turn enhances CFP. However, it also explores the moderating role of GW in this relationship, revealing that significant GW practices can substantially diminish the positive impact of EI on CFP. This indicates that while EI can improve CFP by optimizing resources and enhancing corporate credibility, the authenticity of these environmental efforts is vital. GW can erode stakeholder trust and negate the benefits of EI. Additionally, the research examines how factors such as the financial ecosystem (e.g. bank concentration and Fintech development) and ownership structure (state-owned enterprises versus non-state-owned enterprises) moderate the EI–CFP relationship. The findings are consistent across various tests including instrumental variable analysis and propensity score matching (PSM). Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the critical role of GW in moderating the EI–CFP relationship and provides a nuanced understanding of the factors that influence the effectiveness of EI in enhancing CFP. It stresses the need for genuine, transparent sustainability practices to maintain stakeholder trust and ensure the financial viability of environmental initiatives. Originality/value This research highlights how insincere environmental claims can undermine both ecological and financial gains, offering novel insights for firms and policymakers aiming to align economic competitiveness with sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Emerging Markets
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-09-2024-1611
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
37.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental innovation and corporate financial performance: the moderating role of greenwashing

R. M. Ammar Zahid, Shahid Ali, Enrico Battisti, Zuzana Vincúrová
18 citations
International Journal of Emerging Markets
Environmental Sustainability in Business
37.31
article

Environmental innovation and corporate financial performance: the moderating role of greenwashing

R. M. Ammar Zahid, Shahid Ali, Enrico Battisti, Zuzana Vincúrová
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Purpose With growing global pressure for businesses to adopt sustainable practices, understanding the interplay between genuine environmental efforts and deceptive greenwashing is critical for fostering both ecological integrity and economic success. This study aims to investigate the intricate relationship between environmental innovation (EI), greenwashing (GW) and corporate financial performance (CFP) in Chinese enterprises. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes data from Chinese enterprises spanning 2008 to 2022. By employing a meticulously developed measure of EI and GW, alongside a robust methodological framework, the research establishes a strong and conclusive connection between EI and CFP policy. Findings This study finds that EI reduces financing constraints, which in turn enhances CFP. However, it also explores the moderating role of GW in this relationship, revealing that significant GW practices can substantially diminish the positive impact of EI on CFP. This indicates that while EI can improve CFP by optimizing resources and enhancing corporate credibility, the authenticity of these environmental efforts is vital. GW can erode stakeholder trust and negate the benefits of EI. Additionally, the research examines how factors such as the financial ecosystem (e.g. bank concentration and Fintech development) and ownership structure (state-owned enterprises versus non-state-owned enterprises) moderate the EI–CFP relationship. The findings are consistent across various tests including instrumental variable analysis and propensity score matching (PSM). Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the critical role of GW in moderating the EI–CFP relationship and provides a nuanced understanding of the factors that influence the effectiveness of EI in enhancing CFP. It stresses the need for genuine, transparent sustainability practices to maintain stakeholder trust and ensure the financial viability of environmental initiatives. Originality/value This research highlights how insincere environmental claims can undermine both ecological and financial gains, offering novel insights for firms and policymakers aiming to align economic competitiveness with sustainability goals.

International Journal of Emerging MarketsVol. 21(2)
Pan-European University (SK), MIT University (MK), Department of Medical Sciences (BY), Hezhou University (CN), Sohar University (OM), University of Turin (IT), EU Business School, Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
37.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.