Principles for the conduct of human factors/ergonomics in healthcare: a scoping study of the published evidence

A total of 13 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria, suggesting that adherence to core HFE principles is rare. All included studies self-identified as HFE intervention studies. All interventions had a clearly defined scope and most targeted at least four system elements, that is, person, tools, technology, task, process, organisation, environment. The 'people' element was the one most commonly targeted. A wide range of organisational level and patient outcomes were measured, but no employee safety or well-being outcomes were measured in the included studies. In all cases, the intervention team included healthcare providers working with HFE/systems engineering/improvement experts, who often led the project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open Quality
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003222
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Principles for the conduct of human factors/ergonomics in healthcare: a scoping study of the published evidence

Marie Ward, Paul O’Connor, Mahnaz Sharafkhani, Margaret Codd et al.
8 citations
BMJ Open Quality
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
11.16
article

Principles for the conduct of human factors/ergonomics in healthcare: a scoping study of the published evidence

Marie Ward, Paul O’Connor, Mahnaz Sharafkhani, Margaret Codd, Mary Browne, Angela O'Dea
article en
8 citations

Abstract

A total of 13 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria, suggesting that adherence to core HFE principles is rare. All included studies self-identified as HFE intervention studies. All interventions had a clearly defined scope and most targeted at least four system elements, that is, person, tools, technology, task, process, organisation, environment. The 'people' element was the one most commonly targeted. A wide range of organisational level and patient outcomes were measured, but no employee safety or well-being outcomes were measured in the included studies. In all cases, the intervention team included healthcare providers working with HFE/systems engineering/improvement experts, who often led the project.

BMJ Open QualityVol. 14(2)
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Health Service Executive (IE), Improvement Service (GB), St. James's Hospital (IE)
University of Galway
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
11.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Principles for the conduct of human factors/ergonomics in healthcare: a scoping study of the published evidence — Marie Ward, Paul O’Connor, et al. · BMJ Open Quality (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS