Autonomy, zoning, and gentrification
Zoning severely limits what individuals can do with their private property. There is also empirical evidence that zoning contributes to the housing affordability crisis. There are good reasons to be skeptical of zoning, yet it is ubiquitous. What (if anything) can justify this widespread yet dubious practice? I critically examine one argument in this paper. The argument says zoning is justified because it facilitates autonomy. After a charitable reconstruction of the argument, I present what I think is a decisive objection to it. While the autonomy defense of zoning ultimately fails, the analysis provides insight into a related topic: gentrification. Many articulate what's wrong with gentrification by arguing that it inhibits autonomy. Reflections on zoning and autonomy show that this claim must be curtailed and common remedies to the problem of gentrification reconsidered.
Authors
- Brian Kogelmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9672-6989)
Institutions
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Politics Philosophy & Economics
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x251330912
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 12.35