NASAL ENDOSCOPY VS CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI PARANASAL SINUS, BETTER MODALITY FOR DIAGNOSING MUCORMYCOSIS

Background: Mucormycosis is a rapidly progressing, life-threatening fungal infection most commonly affecting immunocompromised individuals, especially those with uncontrolled diabetes or a history of corticosteroid use. Timely diagnosis is critical to reduce mortality and improve outcomes. In resource-constrained settings, identifying a single reliable diagnostic modality becomes essential to initiate prompt treatment. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of nasal endoscopy and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against histopathology as the gold standard. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of nasal endoscopy and contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of mucormycosis using histopathology as the reference standard. Methods: This cross-sectional validation study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi, from January 2022 to 2024. A total of 82 patients aged ≥18 years presenting with clinical suspicion of mucormycosis were enrolled through non-probability consecutive sampling. All patients underwent nasal endoscopy, contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain, paranasal sinuses and orbits, and tissue biopsy for histopathological confirmation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for both modalities. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22. Results: The mean age of patients was 51.34 ± 11.54 years; 57 (69.51%) were male, and 25 (30.49%) were female. The mean BMI was 33.84 ± 4.54 kg/m², and mean HbA1c was 7.46 ± 1.63%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of nasal endoscopy were 57.63%, 69.57%, 82.93%, 39.02%, and 60.98%, respectively. For contrast-enhanced MRI, these values were 83.05%, 78.26%, 90.74%, 64.29%, and 81.71%, respectively. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than nasal endoscopy and should be preferred as the initial investigation in patients with suspected mucormycosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/xshsvj58
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NASAL ENDOSCOPY VS CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI PARANASAL SINUS, BETTER MODALITY FOR DIAGNOSING MUCORMYCOSIS

Wisal Ahmed, Adeel Zafar, Muhammad Aasim, S. S. Qureshi et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

NASAL ENDOSCOPY VS CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI PARANASAL SINUS, BETTER MODALITY FOR DIAGNOSING MUCORMYCOSIS

Wisal Ahmed, Adeel Zafar, Muhammad Aasim, S. S. Qureshi, Hakeem Asad, Nauman Jamil, Tahir Liaquat
article en

Abstract

Background: Mucormycosis is a rapidly progressing, life-threatening fungal infection most commonly affecting immunocompromised individuals, especially those with uncontrolled diabetes or a history of corticosteroid use. Timely diagnosis is critical to reduce mortality and improve outcomes. In resource-constrained settings, identifying a single reliable diagnostic modality becomes essential to initiate prompt treatment. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of nasal endoscopy and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against histopathology as the gold standard. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of nasal endoscopy and contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of mucormycosis using histopathology as the reference standard. Methods: This cross-sectional validation study was conducted at Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi, from January 2022 to 2024. A total of 82 patients aged ≥18 years presenting with clinical suspicion of mucormycosis were enrolled through non-probability consecutive sampling. All patients underwent nasal endoscopy, contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain, paranasal sinuses and orbits, and tissue biopsy for histopathological confirmation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for both modalities. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22. Results: The mean age of patients was 51.34 ± 11.54 years; 57 (69.51%) were male, and 25 (30.49%) were female. The mean BMI was 33.84 ± 4.54 kg/m², and mean HbA1c was 7.46 ± 1.63%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of nasal endoscopy were 57.63%, 69.57%, 82.93%, 39.02%, and 60.98%, respectively. For contrast-enhanced MRI, these values were 83.05%, 78.26%, 90.74%, 64.29%, and 81.71%, respectively. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than nasal endoscopy and should be preferred as the initial investigation in patients with suspected mucormycosis.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(2 (Health & Allied))
Combined Military Hospital (PK)
Strong
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.