The CFD investigation on heat transfer performance of different pipe geometries at various Reynolds numbers

In this study, three different pipe geometries have been evaluated to investigate the effects of pipe geometry on heat transfer for incompressible flows at different Reynolds numbers. The selected geometries have been determined as dimpled, corrugated, and helical. The study performed 3-D analyses, and Reynolds numbers were selected as 2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000. The SST k-? model has been used in the turbulent flow regime, while laminar flow conditions have been analyzed using the appropriate solver settings. The obtained results have been compared using heat transfer coefficient values and skin friction coefficient. The helical pipe demonstrated the highest heat transfer coefficient among all geometries, with a value of 1951 W/m?K at Re = 5000, while the dimpled and corrugated pipes exhibited values of 1910 W/m?K and 1805 W/m?K, respectively. Similarly, the helical pipe showed the lowest skin friction coefficient, with a value of 2.02 at Re = 5000, compared to 2.61 for the corrugated pipe. It has been observed that the heat transfer coefficient and the skin friction coefficient increased with the increase in Reynolds number. The wall temperature distributions on each pipe geometry for laminar and turbulent flow conditions have been obtained and analyzed. When the results were examined, it was determined that the highest heat transfer values were obtained in the helical pipe geometry at all Reynolds numbers, while the highest skin friction coefficient was observed in the corrugated pipe geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thermal Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci250105076k
Primary Topic
Erosion and Abrasive Machining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The CFD investigation on heat transfer performance of different pipe geometries at various Reynolds numbers

Mirko Komatina, Haydar Kepekçi
3 links
Thermal Science
Erosion and Abrasive Machining
article

The CFD investigation on heat transfer performance of different pipe geometries at various Reynolds numbers

Mirko Komatina, Haydar Kepekçi
article en

Abstract

In this study, three different pipe geometries have been evaluated to investigate the effects of pipe geometry on heat transfer for incompressible flows at different Reynolds numbers. The selected geometries have been determined as dimpled, corrugated, and helical. The study performed 3-D analyses, and Reynolds numbers were selected as 2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000. The SST k-? model has been used in the turbulent flow regime, while laminar flow conditions have been analyzed using the appropriate solver settings. The obtained results have been compared using heat transfer coefficient values and skin friction coefficient. The helical pipe demonstrated the highest heat transfer coefficient among all geometries, with a value of 1951 W/m?K at Re = 5000, while the dimpled and corrugated pipes exhibited values of 1910 W/m?K and 1805 W/m?K, respectively. Similarly, the helical pipe showed the lowest skin friction coefficient, with a value of 2.02 at Re = 5000, compared to 2.61 for the corrugated pipe. It has been observed that the heat transfer coefficient and the skin friction coefficient increased with the increase in Reynolds number. The wall temperature distributions on each pipe geometry for laminar and turbulent flow conditions have been obtained and analyzed. When the results were examined, it was determined that the highest heat transfer values were obtained in the helical pipe geometry at all Reynolds numbers, while the highest skin friction coefficient was observed in the corrugated pipe geometry.

Thermal ScienceVol. 29(5 Part B)
University of Belgrade (RS), İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi (TR)
Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Erosion and Abrasive Machining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.