A general approach for determining applicability domain of machine learning models

Knowledge of the domain of applicability of a machine learning model is essential to ensuring accurate and reliable model predictions. In this work, we develop a new and general approach of assessing model domain and demonstrate that our approach provides accurate and meaningful domain designation across multiple model types and material property data sets. Our approach assesses the distance between data in feature space using kernel density estimation, where this distance provides an effective tool for domain determination. We show that chemical groups considered unrelated based on chemical knowledge exhibit significant dissimilarities by our measure. We also show that high measures of dissimilarity are associated with poor model performance (i.e., high residual magnitudes) and poor estimates of model uncertainty (i.e., unreliable uncertainty estimation). Automated tools are provided to enable researchers to establish acceptable dissimilarity thresholds to identify whether new predictions of their own machine learning models are in-domain versus out-of-domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Computational Materials
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01573-x
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A general approach for determining applicability domain of machine learning models

Ryan Jacobs, Lane E. Schultz, Dane Morgan, Yiqi Wang
17 citations
npj Computational Materials
Machine Learning in Materials Science
8.80
article

A general approach for determining applicability domain of machine learning models

Ryan Jacobs, Lane E. Schultz, Dane Morgan, Yiqi Wang
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Knowledge of the domain of applicability of a machine learning model is essential to ensuring accurate and reliable model predictions. In this work, we develop a new and general approach of assessing model domain and demonstrate that our approach provides accurate and meaningful domain designation across multiple model types and material property data sets. Our approach assesses the distance between data in feature space using kernel density estimation, where this distance provides an effective tool for domain determination. We show that chemical groups considered unrelated based on chemical knowledge exhibit significant dissimilarities by our measure. We also show that high measures of dissimilarity are associated with poor model performance (i.e., high residual magnitudes) and poor estimates of model uncertainty (i.e., unreliable uncertainty estimation). Automated tools are provided to enable researchers to establish acceptable dissimilarity thresholds to identify whether new predictions of their own machine learning models are in-domain versus out-of-domain.

npj Computational MaterialsVol. 11(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
8.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.