Integrating the Root Assessment Method with Subjective Weighting Methods for Battery Electric Vehicle Selection

The global automotive industry is actively transitioning towards the production of BEVs (Battery Electric Vehicles) to significantly reduce carbon emissions and address climate change. In the context of a world striving for sustainable development, selecting the right BEV has become a crucial decision for consumers. This study pioneers the application of the RAM (Root Assessment Method) method for BEV selection among 10 available options. Each electric vehicle is described by 11 criteria, with weights calculated using two subjective weighting methods: the ROC method and the RS (Rank Sum) method. Regardless of the weighting method employed for the criteria, the RAM method consistently identifies the same optimal BEV. Furthermore, the top-ranked electric vehicles obtained using the RAM method in conjunction with either the ROC or RS weighting methods exhibit a high degree of similarity to those determined using other ranking methods and different criteria weighting approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10291
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating the Root Assessment Method with Subjective Weighting Methods for Battery Electric Vehicle Selection

Duong Van Duc, Tran Van Dua, Pham Viet Thanh, Hoang Xuan Khoa
1 citations
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Integrating the Root Assessment Method with Subjective Weighting Methods for Battery Electric Vehicle Selection

Duong Van Duc, Tran Van Dua, Pham Viet Thanh, Hoang Xuan Khoa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The global automotive industry is actively transitioning towards the production of BEVs (Battery Electric Vehicles) to significantly reduce carbon emissions and address climate change. In the context of a world striving for sustainable development, selecting the right BEV has become a crucial decision for consumers. This study pioneers the application of the RAM (Root Assessment Method) method for BEV selection among 10 available options. Each electric vehicle is described by 11 criteria, with weights calculated using two subjective weighting methods: the ROC method and the RS (Rank Sum) method. Regardless of the weighting method employed for the criteria, the RAM method consistently identifies the same optimal BEV. Furthermore, the top-ranked electric vehicles obtained using the RAM method in conjunction with either the ROC or RS weighting methods exhibit a high degree of similarity to those determined using other ranking methods and different criteria weighting approaches.

Engineering Technology & Applied Science ResearchVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating the Root Assessment Method with Subjective Weighting Methods for Battery Electric Vehicle Selection — Duong Van Duc, Tran Van Dua, et al. · Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS