When sunshine gets you down: The role of transparency on public sentiment toward the amazon <scp>HQ2</scp> competition

Abstract In 2019, more than 230 local governments sought to attract the second headquarters of Amazon (HQ2). The Amazon HQ2 contest presents a unique, high‐profile case of state and local government competition for a project. It took place in a defined timeframe with varying bids and levels of government transparency and offers a rare window to explore how the information environment shapes expressions of sentiment by distinct actors in the political market framework (e.g., politicians, pro‐development actors, media, and the public). By analyzing nearly 40,000 Tweets across the United States and classifying actors' roles in the policy‐making process, we are able to discern how the transparency of communities' HQ2 bids differentially shaped public sentiment around this large‐scale economic development deal. “Sunshine,” we find, led to gloomy perspectives on the bids, though this negativity was moderated by actors' positions in the policy‐making process. Our results suggest that the non‐transparency of incentive deals is a strategy used to minimize criticism of politicians' economic development policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When sunshine gets you down: The role of transparency on public sentiment toward the amazon HQ2 competition

Eric Stokan, Ian G. Anson, Nathan M. Jensen
1 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Media Influence and Politics
4.20
article

When sunshine gets you down: The role of transparency on public sentiment toward the amazon HQ2 competition

Eric Stokan, Ian G. Anson, Nathan M. Jensen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In 2019, more than 230 local governments sought to attract the second headquarters of Amazon (HQ2). The Amazon HQ2 contest presents a unique, high‐profile case of state and local government competition for a project. It took place in a defined timeframe with varying bids and levels of government transparency and offers a rare window to explore how the information environment shapes expressions of sentiment by distinct actors in the political market framework (e.g., politicians, pro‐development actors, media, and the public). By analyzing nearly 40,000 Tweets across the United States and classifying actors' roles in the policy‐making process, we are able to discern how the transparency of communities' HQ2 bids differentially shaped public sentiment around this large‐scale economic development deal. “Sunshine,” we find, led to gloomy perspectives on the bids, though this negativity was moderated by actors' positions in the policy‐making process. Our results suggest that the non‐transparency of incentive deals is a strategy used to minimize criticism of politicians' economic development policies.

Policy Studies JournalVol. 53(2)
University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Media Influence and Politics
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When sunshine gets you down: The role of transparency on public sentiment toward the amazon <scp>HQ2</scp> competition — Eric Stokan, Ian G. Anson, et al. · Policy Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS