RESTRICTED LEXIS: MAIN THEORETICAL APPROACHES IN ITS STUDY

In this article, the concept of restricted lexis in a language is examined from various theoretical perspectives, drawing upon scholarly works published in Sweden, England, Russia, France, Turkey, and Germany. The author emphasizes that restricted lexis differs from the general lexical stock by virtue of occurring in particular spheres (professional jargon, specialized fields, subcultural or colloquial speech). The main theoretical approaches—terminological (focus on domain-specific terms), stylistic (emphasis on functional styles), semiotic (symbols and coded signs), translational (functional adaptation in other languages), sociolinguistic (group-based lexicon), and cognitive (mental categorization)—are reviewed in detail. The paper also addresses the expansion of restricted lexis in the digital era (e.g., slang on social media, internet jargon), the importance of corpus linguistics, interviews, and contextual analysis for research methodology, and highlights the practical significance of studying restricted lexis for translation, lexicography, marketing, and other domains. Ultimately, the author concludes that restricted lexis proves to be a critical object of inquiry for modern linguistics, stylistics, translation studies, and sociolinguistics, particularly as globalization and digital communications continue to generate new subvarieties of vocabulary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2025.v3.i3.pp46-50
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESTRICTED LEXIS: MAIN THEORETICAL APPROACHES IN ITS STUDY

Ahmedova Gulnoza Hayot qizi
Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

RESTRICTED LEXIS: MAIN THEORETICAL APPROACHES IN ITS STUDY

Ahmedova Gulnoza Hayot qizi
article en

Abstract

In this article, the concept of restricted lexis in a language is examined from various theoretical perspectives, drawing upon scholarly works published in Sweden, England, Russia, France, Turkey, and Germany. The author emphasizes that restricted lexis differs from the general lexical stock by virtue of occurring in particular spheres (professional jargon, specialized fields, subcultural or colloquial speech). The main theoretical approaches—terminological (focus on domain-specific terms), stylistic (emphasis on functional styles), semiotic (symbols and coded signs), translational (functional adaptation in other languages), sociolinguistic (group-based lexicon), and cognitive (mental categorization)—are reviewed in detail. The paper also addresses the expansion of restricted lexis in the digital era (e.g., slang on social media, internet jargon), the importance of corpus linguistics, interviews, and contextual analysis for research methodology, and highlights the practical significance of studying restricted lexis for translation, lexicography, marketing, and other domains. Ultimately, the author concludes that restricted lexis proves to be a critical object of inquiry for modern linguistics, stylistics, translation studies, and sociolinguistics, particularly as globalization and digital communications continue to generate new subvarieties of vocabulary.

Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 3(3)
Bukhara State University (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.