Precise aftershock activity in the marine source region of the 2024 Noto-Hanto earthquake by rapid response observation using ocean bottom seismometers

Abstract The 2024 Noto-Hanto earthquake with a magnitude of 7.6 occurred in the Noto Peninsula on January 1, 2024. The mainshock had a reverse fault focal solution and direction of compression axis was the northwest–southeast. In the Noto Peninsula, earthquake swarms have been observed since December 2020. In contrast to this swarm activity, the mainshock had extending to the marine area. Therefore, we performed a rapid response seafloor seismic observation in the source region and its vicinity. We deployed 34 free-fall pop-up type ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs) in January 2024, recovered 26 short-period OBSs (SPOBSs) after a month. The arrival times of the P- and S-waves were manually read from the data of SPOBSs and land seismic stations based on the event list by a land seismic network. We relocated the hypocenters of the events by combination of the location programs using absolute travel times with station corrections and the double-difference method. A velocity model was derived from the velocity structure by the marine seismic survey. Focal mechanisms were estimated using the grid search method based on the polarities of the first Pwave arrivals. The aftershock depths mostly ranged from 0.2 km to 17 km. Although the aftershock activity seems to be confined in the upper crust, relatively deep events occurred in the easternmost source region. The aftershocks formed several dipping planes corresponding to the multiple faults described in the offshore active fault model constructed before the mainshock. The upper boundaries of the planes of the hypocenter distribution coincide with the upper edges of the modeled faults, and the lower boundary of the aftershock distribution also aligns well with the lower edges of the faults. This consistency indicates that the rupture at the mainshock propagated to faults with different geometries. Although 70 events had a reverse fault focal mechanism similar to the mainshock, we identified 87 strike-slip events. Most of the events involving both reverse and strike-slip faults had P -axes perpendicular to the fault strike. This finding suggests that the aftershock activity was affected by a northwest–southeast compressional stress. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02171-3
Citations
15
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precise aftershock activity in the marine source region of the 2024 Noto-Hanto earthquake by rapid response observation using ocean bottom seismometers

Tomoaki Yamada, Yoshio Murai, Ryota Hino, Yusaku Ohta et al.
15 citations
Earth Planets and Space
earthquake and tectonic studies
26.13
article

Precise aftershock activity in the marine source region of the 2024 Noto-Hanto earthquake by rapid response observation using ocean bottom seismometers

Tomoaki Yamada, Yoshio Murai, Ryota Hino, Yusaku Ohta, Kazuo Nakahigashi, Tsutomu Takahashi, Noriyuki Murai, Hiroshi Yakiwara, Hideji Abe, Syuichi Suzuki, Shun‐ichiro Ogura, Yusuke Yamashita, Takehi Isse, Takafumi Kasaya, Yuzuru Kaneko, Eiji Kurashimo, Shuichi Kodaira, Masanao Shinohara, Gou Fujie, Toshinori Sato, Hajime Shiobara, Ryosuke Azuma, Shun Fukushima, Shinichi Tanaka, Yoshihiro Ito, Takeshi Akuhara, Yasuo Sasagawa, Koichiro Obana, Shin’ichi Sakai, Tazro Ohta, Shuichirou Hirano, Yusuke Ota, Shuichi Suzuki, Kimihiro Mochizuki, Masataka Masuda, Yukihiro Nakatani, Yuto Hirayama, K Takahashi, Hisatoshi Baba, Ching-Yu Hu, Ryotaro Fujimura, Takehi lsse, Hiroaki Yamahana, Aina Idoguchi
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Abstract The 2024 Noto-Hanto earthquake with a magnitude of 7.6 occurred in the Noto Peninsula on January 1, 2024. The mainshock had a reverse fault focal solution and direction of compression axis was the northwest–southeast. In the Noto Peninsula, earthquake swarms have been observed since December 2020. In contrast to this swarm activity, the mainshock had extending to the marine area. Therefore, we performed a rapid response seafloor seismic observation in the source region and its vicinity. We deployed 34 free-fall pop-up type ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs) in January 2024, recovered 26 short-period OBSs (SPOBSs) after a month. The arrival times of the P- and S-waves were manually read from the data of SPOBSs and land seismic stations based on the event list by a land seismic network. We relocated the hypocenters of the events by combination of the location programs using absolute travel times with station corrections and the double-difference method. A velocity model was derived from the velocity structure by the marine seismic survey. Focal mechanisms were estimated using the grid search method based on the polarities of the first Pwave arrivals. The aftershock depths mostly ranged from 0.2 km to 17 km. Although the aftershock activity seems to be confined in the upper crust, relatively deep events occurred in the easternmost source region. The aftershocks formed several dipping planes corresponding to the multiple faults described in the offshore active fault model constructed before the mainshock. The upper boundaries of the planes of the hypocenter distribution coincide with the upper edges of the modeled faults, and the lower boundary of the aftershock distribution also aligns well with the lower edges of the faults. This consistency indicates that the rupture at the mainshock propagated to faults with different geometries. Although 70 events had a reverse fault focal mechanism similar to the mainshock, we identified 87 strike-slip events. Most of the events involving both reverse and strike-slip faults had P -axes perpendicular to the fault strike. This finding suggests that the aftershock activity was affected by a northwest–southeast compressional stress. Graphical Abstract

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 77(1)
Kagoshima University (JP), Shizuoka University (JP), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), Chiba University (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Kagoshima University, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Hokkaido University, Chiba University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
earthquake and tectonic studies
26.13
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.