Incentives crowd out voluntary cooperation: evidence from gift-exchange experiments

Abstract Explicit and implicit incentives and opportunities for mutually beneficial voluntary cooperation coexist in many economic relationships. In a series of eight laboratory gift-exchange experiments, we show that incentives can lead to crowding out of voluntary cooperation even after they have been abolished. This crowding-out also occurs in repeated relationships, which otherwise strongly increase effort compared to one-shot interactions. Using a unified econometric framework, we unpack these results as a function of positive and negative reciprocity, as well as the principals’ wage offer and the incentive compatibility of the contract. Crowding-out occurs mostly due to reduced wages and not a change in reciprocal wage–effort relationships. Our systematic analysis also replicates established results on gift exchange, incentives, and crowding out of voluntary cooperation while being exposed to incentives. Overall, our findings show that the behavioral consequences of explicit incentives strongly depend on the features of the situation in which they are embedded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Economics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2024.14
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentives crowd out voluntary cooperation: evidence from gift-exchange experiments

Manfred Königstein, Simon Gächter, Esther Kaiser
3 citations
Experimental Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
7.10
article

Incentives crowd out voluntary cooperation: evidence from gift-exchange experiments

Manfred Königstein, Simon Gächter, Esther Kaiser
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Explicit and implicit incentives and opportunities for mutually beneficial voluntary cooperation coexist in many economic relationships. In a series of eight laboratory gift-exchange experiments, we show that incentives can lead to crowding out of voluntary cooperation even after they have been abolished. This crowding-out also occurs in repeated relationships, which otherwise strongly increase effort compared to one-shot interactions. Using a unified econometric framework, we unpack these results as a function of positive and negative reciprocity, as well as the principals’ wage offer and the incentive compatibility of the contract. Crowding-out occurs mostly due to reduced wages and not a change in reciprocal wage–effort relationships. Our systematic analysis also replicates established results on gift exchange, incentives, and crowding out of voluntary cooperation while being exposed to incentives. Overall, our findings show that the behavioral consequences of explicit incentives strongly depend on the features of the situation in which they are embedded.

Experimental EconomicsVol. 28(1)
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Nottingham (GB), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), University of Erfurt (DE), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE)
Universität St. Gallen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.