Efficiency Assessment of Cruciform Steel Columns: Balancing Axial Capacity and Weight

Cruciform steel columns, also known as king and queen cross sections, have gained attention in structural engineering for their ability to overcome the limitations of traditional I-sections and H-sections. These limitations include reduced stability due to slenderness effects and excessive material usage in tall columns. Designed to enhance axial load capacity while minimizing weight, cruciform sections offer a more efficient, cost-effective, and sustainable alternative for modern construction. This study assesses the efficiency of cruciform steel columns by comparing their design axial capacities to their unit weights. Using AISC 360-16 provisions, single supported columns with heights of 2 m, 3 m, 4 m, and 5 m were analyzed. The results show that all sections perform similarly for short columns (2 m), with efficiency differences of less than 8% due to the minimal impact of slenderness. However, at 3 m, the I-section is 20% less efficient than the H-section and 30% less efficient than cruciform sections. For taller columns (4 m and 5 m), cruciform sections outperform conventional sections, with the king cross-section proving to be 30% more efficient than the H-section and superior to the queen cross-section. These findings highlight the structural and material advantages of cruciform sections, particularly in applications requiring tall columns with significant slenderness effects. By reducing material usage while maintaining high load-bearing capacity, cruciform sections enhance sustainability by lowering both carbon and construction costs. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing steel column designs to achieve more sustainable and cost-effective construction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10107
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency Assessment of Cruciform Steel Columns: Balancing Axial Capacity and Weight

Made Suangga, Riza Suwondo, Militia Keintjem
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Efficiency Assessment of Cruciform Steel Columns: Balancing Axial Capacity and Weight

Made Suangga, Riza Suwondo, Militia Keintjem
article en

Abstract

Cruciform steel columns, also known as king and queen cross sections, have gained attention in structural engineering for their ability to overcome the limitations of traditional I-sections and H-sections. These limitations include reduced stability due to slenderness effects and excessive material usage in tall columns. Designed to enhance axial load capacity while minimizing weight, cruciform sections offer a more efficient, cost-effective, and sustainable alternative for modern construction. This study assesses the efficiency of cruciform steel columns by comparing their design axial capacities to their unit weights. Using AISC 360-16 provisions, single supported columns with heights of 2 m, 3 m, 4 m, and 5 m were analyzed. The results show that all sections perform similarly for short columns (2 m), with efficiency differences of less than 8% due to the minimal impact of slenderness. However, at 3 m, the I-section is 20% less efficient than the H-section and 30% less efficient than cruciform sections. For taller columns (4 m and 5 m), cruciform sections outperform conventional sections, with the king cross-section proving to be 30% more efficient than the H-section and superior to the queen cross-section. These findings highlight the structural and material advantages of cruciform sections, particularly in applications requiring tall columns with significant slenderness effects. By reducing material usage while maintaining high load-bearing capacity, cruciform sections enhance sustainability by lowering both carbon and construction costs. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing steel column designs to achieve more sustainable and cost-effective construction.

Engineering Technology & Applied Science ResearchVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.