The bright and dark sides of AI innovation for sustainable development: Understanding the paradoxical tension between value creation and value destruction

This paper explores the bright and dark sides of artificial intelligence (AI) innovation for sustainable development. While most research has concentrated on the positive impacts of AI innovation, this study examines the paradoxical tension that arises between sustainable value creation and sustainable value destruction when managing AI innovation to achieve sustainable development. We conceptualize a model explaining the antecedents and the nature of this tension, and we discuss seven illustrative cases that exemplify the practical applicability of the model's elements. Our findings show that conflicting sub-objectives across environmental, social, and economic domains, along with the divergent interests of stakeholders, are key antecedents of the paradoxical tension. Furthermore, our model illustrates that sustainable value can be created by: (i) reducing grand challenges through automation in defining problems' root cause, and (ii) mitigating grand challenges through augmentation of firms' capabilities. However, we argue that sustainable value can be also destroyed when failing to address grand challenges or introducing new grand challenges. According to our study, this is due to predictable or unpredictable issues that arise during the design, development, or deployment of AI innovation. Finally, the discussion of our model further explores, through five theorical propositions, the specific elements of AI innovation that enable and amplify this paradoxical tension. • Managing AI innovation entails a paradoxical tension between sustainable value creation and destruction. • Multiple objectives and interests are the antecedents of the paradoxical tension. • Sustainable value creation involves grand challenge reduction or mitigation. • Sustainable value destruction is failing to address or introducing a grand challenge. • AI automation/augmentation and problems in AI lifecycle affect the paradoxical tension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technovation
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103232
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The bright and dark sides of AI innovation for sustainable development: Understanding the paradoxical tension between value creation and value destruction

Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, Ilaria Mancuso, Umberto Panniello, Giovanni Vaia
19 citations
Technovation
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
46.49
article

The bright and dark sides of AI innovation for sustainable development: Understanding the paradoxical tension between value creation and value destruction

Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, Ilaria Mancuso, Umberto Panniello, Giovanni Vaia
article en
19 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the bright and dark sides of artificial intelligence (AI) innovation for sustainable development. While most research has concentrated on the positive impacts of AI innovation, this study examines the paradoxical tension that arises between sustainable value creation and sustainable value destruction when managing AI innovation to achieve sustainable development. We conceptualize a model explaining the antecedents and the nature of this tension, and we discuss seven illustrative cases that exemplify the practical applicability of the model's elements. Our findings show that conflicting sub-objectives across environmental, social, and economic domains, along with the divergent interests of stakeholders, are key antecedents of the paradoxical tension. Furthermore, our model illustrates that sustainable value can be created by: (i) reducing grand challenges through automation in defining problems' root cause, and (ii) mitigating grand challenges through augmentation of firms' capabilities. However, we argue that sustainable value can be also destroyed when failing to address grand challenges or introducing new grand challenges. According to our study, this is due to predictable or unpredictable issues that arise during the design, development, or deployment of AI innovation. Finally, the discussion of our model further explores, through five theorical propositions, the specific elements of AI innovation that enable and amplify this paradoxical tension. • Managing AI innovation entails a paradoxical tension between sustainable value creation and destruction. • Multiple objectives and interests are the antecedents of the paradoxical tension. • Sustainable value creation involves grand challenge reduction or mitigation. • Sustainable value destruction is failing to address or introducing a grand challenge. • AI automation/augmentation and problems in AI lifecycle affect the paradoxical tension.

TechnovationVol. 143
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
46.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.