The doctrine of St. Gregory Palamas and doctrine of Nikephoros Gregoras about the difference between essence and energies (the third stage of palamite conversy)

Introduction . The purpose of this article is to carry out a critical analysis of the doctrine of St. Gregory Palamas and the doctrine of Nikephoros Gregoras, to identify significant contradictions regarding different understanding these authors of the "nature" of God's energies, the relationship between God's essence and God's energies, and the different understanding of communion to God by essence (point of view of Nikephoros Gregoras) and by grace (point of view of Gregory Palamas). Materials and methods . In this article the methodology of critical analysis and the methodology of the rational reconstruction of the researched materials are used, combined with the methods of comparative analysis of doctrine of St. Gregory Palamas and the doctrine of Nikephoros Gregoras. Results . The point of view of Gregory Palamas concerning the “nature” of the uncreated energies is researched in this article. In the understanding of St. Gregory Palamas, this category includes the following: first, God's designs, second, God's abilities (wills) to perform some actions, third, God's actions, and, finally, fourth, the outpouring of the God's essence (grace). This is that which goes beyond the essence of God, but not beyond His existence (into the realm of creatures). This is that by which people commune to God. This a point of view is opposed to that of Nikephoros Gregoras. Since, according to Gregoras, God is pure actuality and there is no potency in Him, God's designs, faculties, and actions are the essence of the same. There is no distinction between them. They are identical and created, realized in time and have a temporal beginning and a temporal end. If, according to Gregoras, uncreated energies do exist, they are identical with God's essence. There is incompatibility of the opinions of the authors under consideration in their understanding of the communion. Thus, if, from the point of view of St. Gregory Palamas, we take communion to God by grace (by uncreated energies), then, according to Gregoras, we take communion to God by His, God's, essence. Discussion and conclusions . We proved that, there is the fundamental incompatibility of the positions of St. Gregory Palamas and Nikephoros Gregoras regarding their understanding of uncreated energies, that provides an area for the further discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of Minin University
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2025-13-1-14
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The doctrine of St. Gregory Palamas and doctrine of Nikephoros Gregoras about the difference between essence and energies (the third stage of palamite conversy)

D. V. Vorobev
Vestnik of Minin University
Byzantine Studies and History
article

The doctrine of St. Gregory Palamas and doctrine of Nikephoros Gregoras about the difference between essence and energies (the third stage of palamite conversy)

D. V. Vorobev
article en

Abstract

Introduction . The purpose of this article is to carry out a critical analysis of the doctrine of St. Gregory Palamas and the doctrine of Nikephoros Gregoras, to identify significant contradictions regarding different understanding these authors of the "nature" of God's energies, the relationship between God's essence and God's energies, and the different understanding of communion to God by essence (point of view of Nikephoros Gregoras) and by grace (point of view of Gregory Palamas). Materials and methods . In this article the methodology of critical analysis and the methodology of the rational reconstruction of the researched materials are used, combined with the methods of comparative analysis of doctrine of St. Gregory Palamas and the doctrine of Nikephoros Gregoras. Results . The point of view of Gregory Palamas concerning the “nature” of the uncreated energies is researched in this article. In the understanding of St. Gregory Palamas, this category includes the following: first, God's designs, second, God's abilities (wills) to perform some actions, third, God's actions, and, finally, fourth, the outpouring of the God's essence (grace). This is that which goes beyond the essence of God, but not beyond His existence (into the realm of creatures). This is that by which people commune to God. This a point of view is opposed to that of Nikephoros Gregoras. Since, according to Gregoras, God is pure actuality and there is no potency in Him, God's designs, faculties, and actions are the essence of the same. There is no distinction between them. They are identical and created, realized in time and have a temporal beginning and a temporal end. If, according to Gregoras, uncreated energies do exist, they are identical with God's essence. There is incompatibility of the opinions of the authors under consideration in their understanding of the communion. Thus, if, from the point of view of St. Gregory Palamas, we take communion to God by grace (by uncreated energies), then, according to Gregoras, we take communion to God by His, God's, essence. Discussion and conclusions . We proved that, there is the fundamental incompatibility of the positions of St. Gregory Palamas and Nikephoros Gregoras regarding their understanding of uncreated energies, that provides an area for the further discussion.

Vestnik of Minin UniversityVol. 13(1)
N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.