Interaction of physostigmine with three injectable anaesthetics in a young chick model

Propofol, thiopental and ketamine are injectable general anaesthetics with different mechanisms of action. Reports vary with respect to the antagonistic action of physostigmine against these anaesthe­tics. The purpose of the present study was to examine the possible interaction of physostigmine with the anaesthetic action of the three anaesthetics in a model of young chicks (7–14 days old). Chicks (8/group) were anaesthetised with propofol at 10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.), thiopental at 20 mg/kg, i.p. and ketamine at 10 mg/kg, intramuscularly (i.m.). The anaesthetised chicks were subjected to treatment challenges with physostigmine (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) or neostigmine (0.125 mg/kg, i.p.), 5 minutes before the anaesthetic injection or after the induction of anaesthesia. When physostigmine was injected before anaesthesia, it prevented propofol but not thiopental or ketamine anaesthesia. Physostigmine given after the anaesthesia reduced the sleep time of propofol, but not those of thiopental or ketamine in chicks. Neostigmine treatments did not significantly affect the anaesthesia induced by the three anaesthetics in chicks. The median effective doses (ED50) of the anaesthetics in chicks were determined by the up-and-down method with or without concomitant physostigmine (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) after the loss of the righting reflex. The ED50 values of propofol, thiopental and ketamine in chicks were 7.712 mg/kg, i.p., 14.744 mg/kg, i.p. and 10.168 mg/kg, i.m., respectively. Physostigmine differentially increased the ED50 of propofol by 137%, and did not affect those of the thiopental and ketamine. Plasma cholinesterase activity was significantly reduced in the propofol and thiopental anaesthetic groups of chicks, whereas that of the ketamine group was not affected. In conclusion, the results suggest that physostigmine, being a cholinergic stimulant, could specifically antagonise propofol anaesthesia in the young chick model, with clinical trial awaiting further studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.2023-0066
Primary Topic
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interaction of physostigmine with three injectable anaesthetics in a young chick model

F. K. Mohammad, Hishyar M. S. Garmavy
BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
article

Interaction of physostigmine with three injectable anaesthetics in a young chick model

F. K. Mohammad, Hishyar M. S. Garmavy
article en

Abstract

Propofol, thiopental and ketamine are injectable general anaesthetics with different mechanisms of action. Reports vary with respect to the antagonistic action of physostigmine against these anaesthe­tics. The purpose of the present study was to examine the possible interaction of physostigmine with the anaesthetic action of the three anaesthetics in a model of young chicks (7–14 days old). Chicks (8/group) were anaesthetised with propofol at 10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.), thiopental at 20 mg/kg, i.p. and ketamine at 10 mg/kg, intramuscularly (i.m.). The anaesthetised chicks were subjected to treatment challenges with physostigmine (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) or neostigmine (0.125 mg/kg, i.p.), 5 minutes before the anaesthetic injection or after the induction of anaesthesia. When physostigmine was injected before anaesthesia, it prevented propofol but not thiopental or ketamine anaesthesia. Physostigmine given after the anaesthesia reduced the sleep time of propofol, but not those of thiopental or ketamine in chicks. Neostigmine treatments did not significantly affect the anaesthesia induced by the three anaesthetics in chicks. The median effective doses (ED50) of the anaesthetics in chicks were determined by the up-and-down method with or without concomitant physostigmine (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) after the loss of the righting reflex. The ED50 values of propofol, thiopental and ketamine in chicks were 7.712 mg/kg, i.p., 14.744 mg/kg, i.p. and 10.168 mg/kg, i.m., respectively. Physostigmine differentially increased the ED50 of propofol by 137%, and did not affect those of the thiopental and ketamine. Plasma cholinesterase activity was significantly reduced in the propofol and thiopental anaesthetic groups of chicks, whereas that of the ketamine group was not affected. In conclusion, the results suggest that physostigmine, being a cholinergic stimulant, could specifically antagonise propofol anaesthesia in the young chick model, with clinical trial awaiting further studies.

BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINEVol. 28(1)
University of Mosul (IQ), University of Duhok (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.