Building Information Modeling-based Cost Estimation

This study conducts a comparative analysis between a Business Information Modeling (BIM)-based and traditional cost estimation methods on the building structure of the Guntung Payung Banjabaru Health Center, Banjabaru City. The Tekla Structures (TS) software is utilized to carry out structural work calculations, including concrete, steel, and iron work, as well as the AHSP/HSPK working drawings from 2021. The BIM analysis results regarding the calculation time and cost differences were compared with the calculation results obtained with Microsoft Excel and AutoCAD. The two methods’ findings demonstrate that the cost difference is 12% for the concrete work and 13% for the iron/rebar work. It can be concluded that the BIM cost estimation method is more efficient, because its processing time is shorter and the calculation results are closer to the project needs compared to the conventional method.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9890
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Information Modeling-based Cost Estimation

Endah Widiastuti, Candra Yuliana, Retna Hapsari Kartadipura, Ibnu Fathonah
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Building Information Modeling-based Cost Estimation

Endah Widiastuti, Candra Yuliana, Retna Hapsari Kartadipura, Ibnu Fathonah
article en

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis between a Business Information Modeling (BIM)-based and traditional cost estimation methods on the building structure of the Guntung Payung Banjabaru Health Center, Banjabaru City. The Tekla Structures (TS) software is utilized to carry out structural work calculations, including concrete, steel, and iron work, as well as the AHSP/HSPK working drawings from 2021. The BIM analysis results regarding the calculation time and cost differences were compared with the calculation results obtained with Microsoft Excel and AutoCAD. The two methods’ findings demonstrate that the cost difference is 12% for the concrete work and 13% for the iron/rebar work. It can be concluded that the BIM cost estimation method is more efficient, because its processing time is shorter and the calculation results are closer to the project needs compared to the conventional method.

Engineering Technology & Applied Science ResearchVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.