Behavior of Concrete Beams encasing castellated Steel Sections with Different Opening Shapes

This study investigates the behavior of concrete-encased castellated steel beams featuring various aperture geometries and shear stud connector configurations. Five Composite Castellated Beam (CCB) specimens were tested under two-point loading conditions, including one control specimen with a solid steel section and four specimens with castellated steel beams encased in Normal-Strength Concrete (NSC). The castellated beams featured either Hexagonal (H) or Rectangular (R) openings, and the shear stud connectors provided either Full (F) or Partial (P) interaction between the steel and concrete components. The research objectives were to determine the maximum load capacity for each sample under applied loads, analyze the resulting deformations, and assess the impact of the opening shape and shear connections on the beam performance. The results showed that the H opening improved the load-bearing capacity by 19% and reduced the deflection and horizontal displacement by 21.47% and 12.86%, respectively, compared to the R opening sample. Specimens with F interaction exhibited a higher load capacity and lower deflection and horizontal displacement than those with P interaction. The F configuration increased load tolerance by 2.44% and decreased the deflection and horizontal displacement rates by 4.17% and 5.86%, respectively, relative to the P configuration. The findings demonstrate the influence of aperture geometry and shear connections on the structural performance of concrete-encased castellated steel beams, providing insights for optimizing their design in composite construction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9389
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavior of Concrete Beams encasing castellated Steel Sections with Different Opening Shapes

Waleed A. Waryosh, Mohammed Taqi Elias Qasim
2 links
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Behavior of Concrete Beams encasing castellated Steel Sections with Different Opening Shapes

Waleed A. Waryosh, Mohammed Taqi Elias Qasim
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the behavior of concrete-encased castellated steel beams featuring various aperture geometries and shear stud connector configurations. Five Composite Castellated Beam (CCB) specimens were tested under two-point loading conditions, including one control specimen with a solid steel section and four specimens with castellated steel beams encased in Normal-Strength Concrete (NSC). The castellated beams featured either Hexagonal (H) or Rectangular (R) openings, and the shear stud connectors provided either Full (F) or Partial (P) interaction between the steel and concrete components. The research objectives were to determine the maximum load capacity for each sample under applied loads, analyze the resulting deformations, and assess the impact of the opening shape and shear connections on the beam performance. The results showed that the H opening improved the load-bearing capacity by 19% and reduced the deflection and horizontal displacement by 21.47% and 12.86%, respectively, compared to the R opening sample. Specimens with F interaction exhibited a higher load capacity and lower deflection and horizontal displacement than those with P interaction. The F configuration increased load tolerance by 2.44% and decreased the deflection and horizontal displacement rates by 4.17% and 5.86%, respectively, relative to the P configuration. The findings demonstrate the influence of aperture geometry and shear connections on the structural performance of concrete-encased castellated steel beams, providing insights for optimizing their design in composite construction.

Engineering Technology & Applied Science ResearchVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.