Which forest type do visitors find most attractive? Integrating management activities with the recreational attractiveness of forests at a landscape level

• A spatially integrated method for forest planning and outdoor recreation management was developed. • Silvicultural regimes were classified as no management, low, medium, and high intensity. • Hotspots of tourist attractiveness were identified based on local Moran’s I . • The highest recreation preferences were found for old multispecies stands located on terrain with pronounced relief. • Coordinating management with recreational attractiveness allows for the enhancement of ecosystem services. This article presents a spatially integrated method for forest management planning and outdoor recreation in forest areas. A survey of 1402 respondents with varied socio-demographic profiles assessed the recreational attractiveness of forest areas. We classified silvicultural regimes into four categories (no management, low, medium, and high-intensity management) and mapped the potential attractiveness of forest areas by means of exploratory spatial data analysis using the Corine Land Cover and Geoportal database. The analysis involved three levels: local (1×1 km grid), district, and regional. By applying local Moran’s I , an indicator of spatial association, the study identified “hotspots and outliers” of recreational attractiveness at a landscape level. The identification of spatial association types served as the foundation for making recommendations for forest planning. The findings indicate that a specific combination of site and terrain characteristics influences perceived attractiveness as respondents showed the highest recreational preferences for old multispecies stands located on terrain with pronounced relief. Nature conservation, surface water, and cultural heritage sites substantially enhanced the recreational attractiveness of forest areas. Our model may be a valuable tool for identifying the recreational attractiveness of forest areas and guiding specific regional forest management strategies. It provides useful information for aligning silvicultural planning with the preferred recreational variant, enabling the identification of forest areas with a given type of recreational attractiveness and implementing forestry practices conducive to enhancing ecosystem services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105367
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which forest type do visitors find most attractive? Integrating management activities with the recreational attractiveness of forests at a landscape level

Emilia Janeczko, Jan Banaś, Stanisław Zięba, Katarzyna Utnik-Banaś et al.
3 citations
Landscape and Urban Planning
Economic and Environmental Valuation
9.39
article

Which forest type do visitors find most attractive? Integrating management activities with the recreational attractiveness of forests at a landscape level

Emilia Janeczko, Jan Banaś, Stanisław Zięba, Katarzyna Utnik-Banaś, Krzysztof Janeczko
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• A spatially integrated method for forest planning and outdoor recreation management was developed. • Silvicultural regimes were classified as no management, low, medium, and high intensity. • Hotspots of tourist attractiveness were identified based on local Moran’s I . • The highest recreation preferences were found for old multispecies stands located on terrain with pronounced relief. • Coordinating management with recreational attractiveness allows for the enhancement of ecosystem services. This article presents a spatially integrated method for forest management planning and outdoor recreation in forest areas. A survey of 1402 respondents with varied socio-demographic profiles assessed the recreational attractiveness of forest areas. We classified silvicultural regimes into four categories (no management, low, medium, and high-intensity management) and mapped the potential attractiveness of forest areas by means of exploratory spatial data analysis using the Corine Land Cover and Geoportal database. The analysis involved three levels: local (1×1 km grid), district, and regional. By applying local Moran’s I , an indicator of spatial association, the study identified “hotspots and outliers” of recreational attractiveness at a landscape level. The identification of spatial association types served as the foundation for making recommendations for forest planning. The findings indicate that a specific combination of site and terrain characteristics influences perceived attractiveness as respondents showed the highest recreational preferences for old multispecies stands located on terrain with pronounced relief. Nature conservation, surface water, and cultural heritage sites substantially enhanced the recreational attractiveness of forest areas. Our model may be a valuable tool for identifying the recreational attractiveness of forest areas and guiding specific regional forest management strategies. It provides useful information for aligning silvicultural planning with the preferred recreational variant, enabling the identification of forest areas with a given type of recreational attractiveness and implementing forestry practices conducive to enhancing ecosystem services.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 259
Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL), University of Agriculture in Krakow (PL)
European Commission, Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.