Lipoprotein(a) Measurement in Lipoprotein Apheresis: Time to Change?

The question of standardizing the measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been discussed for many years, but the unavailability of automated methods insensitive to the structural heterogeneity of Lp(a) and the transition to a new unit of measurement have delayed this process. The aim of this study is to compare, in subjects undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment (31 subjects, mean age 62 ± 11 years, female 7/31), Lp(a) measurements performed using routine polyclonal antibodies with a method that recognizes a single copy of apo(a) per molecule. This pilot study for adopting an assay insensitive to apo(a) size polymorphism showed a good match with the traditional method: correlations between pre-LA and post-LA measures show an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.89 and 0.76, respectively. Despite the interpretative problem caused by adopting different units of measurement, we believe that moving to an assay insensitive to the dimensional variation of apo(a) represents a necessary change to standardize, improve, and extend the accuracy and diagnostic power of Lp(a).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.70018
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lipoprotein(a) Measurement in Lipoprotein Apheresis: Time to Change?

Carmen Corciulo, Federico Bigazzi, Francesco Sbrana, Beatrice Dal Pino
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Lipoprotein(a) Measurement in Lipoprotein Apheresis: Time to Change?

Carmen Corciulo, Federico Bigazzi, Francesco Sbrana, Beatrice Dal Pino
article en

Abstract

The question of standardizing the measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been discussed for many years, but the unavailability of automated methods insensitive to the structural heterogeneity of Lp(a) and the transition to a new unit of measurement have delayed this process. The aim of this study is to compare, in subjects undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment (31 subjects, mean age 62 ± 11 years, female 7/31), Lp(a) measurements performed using routine polyclonal antibodies with a method that recognizes a single copy of apo(a) per molecule. This pilot study for adopting an assay insensitive to apo(a) size polymorphism showed a good match with the traditional method: correlations between pre-LA and post-LA measures show an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.89 and 0.76, respectively. Despite the interpretative problem caused by adopting different units of measurement, we believe that moving to an assay insensitive to the dimensional variation of apo(a) represents a necessary change to standardize, improve, and extend the accuracy and diagnostic power of Lp(a).

Journal of Clinical ApheresisVol. 40(2)
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lipoprotein(a) Measurement in Lipoprotein Apheresis: Time to Change? — Carmen Corciulo, Federico Bigazzi, et al. · Journal of Clinical Apheresis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS