Demonstration of a mixed-methods illuminative evaluation: the case of a sports and exercise academic program

Introduction: In sports and exercise science education, ensuring that curricular components translate into practical skills is particularly critical. Higher education programs often struggle to align their instructional design with the actual learning experiences of students. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the alignment between the instructional system (intended program design) and the learning milieu (implemented experiences) of a sports and exercise science academic program, demonstrating an innovative mixed-methods illuminative evaluation framework. Methodology: A three-phase sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Qualitative interviews with stakeholders were first conducted to identify key program components and themes. A survey instrument was developed based on these qualitative insights and underwent content validation. Finally, the validated survey was administered to current students and alumni, and the data were analyzed using Importance–Performance Analysis. Results: The evaluation found that in-class program elements – including teacher preparation, learning activities, and learning environment – were regarded as highly important and were delivered effectively, indicating strong alignment between the program’s design and student experiences. In contrast, the on-the-job training component showed lower perceived importance and weaker performance. Discussion: These findings mirrored prior research in showing that well-prepared instructors and supportive learning environments enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. The results underscored the persistent challenge of bridging theoretical instruction with practical application in higher education. Conclusions: The study provided actionable recommendations to strengthen the OJT segment of the curriculum and introduced a novel mixed-methods evaluation model. This integrated approach offered alternative assessment of the program and can serve as a blueprint for future evaluations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.110124
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demonstration of a mixed-methods illuminative evaluation: the case of a sports and exercise academic program

Bryan M. Nozaleda, Jasmin B. Saquing, Maricel L. Dayag-Tungpalan, Chita C. Ramos et al.
Retos
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Demonstration of a mixed-methods illuminative evaluation: the case of a sports and exercise academic program

Bryan M. Nozaleda, Jasmin B. Saquing, Maricel L. Dayag-Tungpalan, Chita C. Ramos, Hans Freyzer B. Arao, Daniel T. Casauay
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In sports and exercise science education, ensuring that curricular components translate into practical skills is particularly critical. Higher education programs often struggle to align their instructional design with the actual learning experiences of students. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the alignment between the instructional system (intended program design) and the learning milieu (implemented experiences) of a sports and exercise science academic program, demonstrating an innovative mixed-methods illuminative evaluation framework. Methodology: A three-phase sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Qualitative interviews with stakeholders were first conducted to identify key program components and themes. A survey instrument was developed based on these qualitative insights and underwent content validation. Finally, the validated survey was administered to current students and alumni, and the data were analyzed using Importance–Performance Analysis. Results: The evaluation found that in-class program elements – including teacher preparation, learning activities, and learning environment – were regarded as highly important and were delivered effectively, indicating strong alignment between the program’s design and student experiences. In contrast, the on-the-job training component showed lower perceived importance and weaker performance. Discussion: These findings mirrored prior research in showing that well-prepared instructors and supportive learning environments enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. The results underscored the persistent challenge of bridging theoretical instruction with practical application in higher education. Conclusions: The study provided actionable recommendations to strengthen the OJT segment of the curriculum and introduced a novel mixed-methods evaluation model. This integrated approach offered alternative assessment of the program and can serve as a blueprint for future evaluations.

RetosVol. 67
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.