Compound and Incorporation Constructions as Combinations of Unexpandable Roots

This paper offers definitions of the terms compound construction, compound and incorporation construction that can be applied to all languages in the same way. The earlier literature has often expressed pessimism about identifying such elements across languages in an objective way, but I propose definitions that do not rely on notions such as “word” or “morphology”. I define incorporation as a special kind of verbal compound construction, and a compound construction as a combination of strictly adjacent roots. Rather than being “non-phrasal”, I say that compounds are defined as not expandable by modifiers. These definitions are shared-core definitions, like most other definitions of comparative concepts: They capture the core of the types of elements that have been called “compound” and “incorporation” in the earlier literature, but not necessarily every compound and every incorporation in every language. It should be noted that the paper does not make any empirical claims, but merely contributes to the methodology of general linguistics by means of a critical and constructive discussion of terminology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21248/zwjw.2025.1.124
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compound and Incorporation Constructions as Combinations of Unexpandable Roots

Martin Haspelmath
1 citations
Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation
Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
0.67
article

Compound and Incorporation Constructions as Combinations of Unexpandable Roots

Martin Haspelmath
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper offers definitions of the terms compound construction, compound and incorporation construction that can be applied to all languages in the same way. The earlier literature has often expressed pessimism about identifying such elements across languages in an objective way, but I propose definitions that do not rely on notions such as “word” or “morphology”. I define incorporation as a special kind of verbal compound construction, and a compound construction as a combination of strictly adjacent roots. Rather than being “non-phrasal”, I say that compounds are defined as not expandable by modifiers. These definitions are shared-core definitions, like most other definitions of comparative concepts: They capture the core of the types of elements that have been called “compound” and “incorporation” in the earlier literature, but not necessarily every compound and every incorporation in every language. It should be noted that the paper does not make any empirical claims, but merely contributes to the methodology of general linguistics by means of a critical and constructive discussion of terminology.

Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word FormationVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.