Politics from the Liminal Space: The Market and the Populist Articulation of Chinese Nationalism in the 1990s and 2000s

The ideological shifts within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) created a disconnect between the developmental policies of the Chinese state and the socialist system in the reform era. This issue was further intensified by the CCP’s decision to abandon its populist political strategies in favor of top-down reforms. This article explores how the China Institute of Strategy and Management, and its flagship journal, Strategy and Management , served as a liminal political space in the reform era, facilitating an intermingling of ideas and acting as an incubator of a new discourse on nationalism by a coalition of dissenting left-wing Chinese government officials, editors, journalists, and intellectuals critical of the top-down policies of the Chinese government. Supported by market forces, this and later similar collaborations led to the blockbuster publications China Can Say No (1996) and Unhappy China (2009).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern China
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00977004251324544
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politics from the Liminal Space: The Market and the Populist Articulation of Chinese Nationalism in the 1990s and 2000s

Xiaoqing Diana Lin
1 links
Modern China
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Politics from the Liminal Space: The Market and the Populist Articulation of Chinese Nationalism in the 1990s and 2000s

Xiaoqing Diana Lin
article en

Abstract

The ideological shifts within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) created a disconnect between the developmental policies of the Chinese state and the socialist system in the reform era. This issue was further intensified by the CCP’s decision to abandon its populist political strategies in favor of top-down reforms. This article explores how the China Institute of Strategy and Management, and its flagship journal, Strategy and Management , served as a liminal political space in the reform era, facilitating an intermingling of ideas and acting as an incubator of a new discourse on nationalism by a coalition of dissenting left-wing Chinese government officials, editors, journalists, and intellectuals critical of the top-down policies of the Chinese government. Supported by market forces, this and later similar collaborations led to the blockbuster publications China Can Say No (1996) and Unhappy China (2009).

Modern ChinaVol. 51(4)
Indiana University Northwest (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Politics from the Liminal Space: The Market and the Populist Articulation of Chinese Nationalism in the 1990s and 2000s — Xiaoqing Diana Lin · Modern China (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS