Residents Navigating Moral Distress After the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision

Strategies used by obstetrics and gynecology residents to combat moral distress from training in abortion-restricted states have varying effectiveness. The role of faculty and institutional leadership appears especially important in mediating the effect of resident moral distress and the success of efforts to combat it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
O&G Open
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/og9.0000000000000074
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residents Navigating Moral Distress After the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision

Emily Claymore, Jema Turk, Abigail S. Cutler, Jody Steinauer
O&G Open
Ethics in medical practice
article

Residents Navigating Moral Distress After the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision

Emily Claymore, Jema Turk, Abigail S. Cutler, Jody Steinauer
article en

Abstract

Strategies used by obstetrics and gynecology residents to combat moral distress from training in abortion-restricted states have varying effectiveness. The role of faculty and institutional leadership appears especially important in mediating the effect of resident moral distress and the success of efforts to combat it.

O&G OpenVol. 2(2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.