Computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory in major depressive disorder and sex differences

This study examined the computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory (VWM) in MDD, focusing on memory precision while exploring potential sex differences. 159 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients and 67 healthy controls (HC) completed the color delay estimation task to measure their VWM. The mainstream models of VWM were compared, and the variable-precision (VP) model was the best fit for our data. The Bayesian ANCOVA was used to compare the differences between groups (MDD & HC) and sexes (male & female). Results revealed that MDD had worse memory precision than HC (BF<sub>10</sub> = 103.872, decisive evidence for H<sub>1</sub>). Specifically, they had larger resource allocation variability (BF<sub>10</sub> = 19.421, strong evidence for H<sub>1</sub>), indicating that they distributed memory resources more unevenly across different items than HC. In addition, females had better memory precision than males (BF<sub>10</sub> = 10.548, strong evidence for H<sub>1</sub>). More specifically, they had more initial resources during the color delay estimation task (BF<sub>10</sub> = 6.003, substantial evidence for H<sub>1</sub>) than males. These findings highlight the critical role of diminished precision, specifically, larger resource allocation variability, in impaired VWM in MDD. Meanwhile, these findings highlight sex differences in memory precision and initial resources of VWM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02662-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory in major depressive disorder and sex differences

Feng Gao, Jie Fan, Q. Kong, Qianmei Yu et al.
2 citations
BMC Psychology
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
article

Computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory in major depressive disorder and sex differences

Feng Gao, Jie Fan, Q. Kong, Qianmei Yu, Zhiyan Wang, Chuman Xiao, Qian Liu, Xinyue Zhang, Xiang Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examined the computational cognitive mechanisms of visual working memory (VWM) in MDD, focusing on memory precision while exploring potential sex differences. 159 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients and 67 healthy controls (HC) completed the color delay estimation task to measure their VWM. The mainstream models of VWM were compared, and the variable-precision (VP) model was the best fit for our data. The Bayesian ANCOVA was used to compare the differences between groups (MDD & HC) and sexes (male & female). Results revealed that MDD had worse memory precision than HC (BF<sub>10</sub> = 103.872, decisive evidence for H<sub>1</sub>). Specifically, they had larger resource allocation variability (BF<sub>10</sub> = 19.421, strong evidence for H<sub>1</sub>), indicating that they distributed memory resources more unevenly across different items than HC. In addition, females had better memory precision than males (BF<sub>10</sub> = 10.548, strong evidence for H<sub>1</sub>). More specifically, they had more initial resources during the color delay estimation task (BF<sub>10</sub> = 6.003, substantial evidence for H<sub>1</sub>) than males. These findings highlight the critical role of diminished precision, specifically, larger resource allocation variability, in impaired VWM in MDD. Meanwhile, these findings highlight sex differences in memory precision and initial resources of VWM.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Central South University (CN), National University of Defense Technology (CN), National Clinical Research (US), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN), Hunan Institute of Mental Health (CN), Zaporizhzhia National University (UA)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.