Hesitant Fuzzy Consensus Reaching Process for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Methods
The emergence and popularity of social media have made large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problems increasingly common, resulting in significant research interest in this field. LSGDM involves numerous evaluators, which can lead to disagreements and hesitancy among them. Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) become crucial in this context as they capture the uncertainty and hesitancy among evaluators. On the other hand, research on the Consensus Reaching Process (CRP) becomes particularly important in dealing with the inevitable differences among the great number of evaluators. Ways to mitigate these differences to reach an agreement are a crucial area of study. For this reason, this paper presents a new CRP model to deal with LSGDM problems in hesitant fuzzy environments. First, HFSs and Normal-type Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (N-HFSs) are introduced to integrate evaluators’ subgroup and collective opinions, aiming to preserve as much decision information as possible while reducing computational complexity. Subsequently, a CRP with a detailed feedback suggestion generation mechanism is developed, which considers the willingness of evaluators to modify their opinions, thereby improving the effectiveness of reaching an agreement. Finally, a LSGDM framework that does not require any normalization process is proposed, and its feasibility and robustness are demonstrated through a numerical example.
Authors
- Ying-Ming Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-2704)
- Meng-Jun Meng
- Wei Liang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3315-8491)
- Rosa M. Rodríguez
- Álvaro Labella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-1011)
Institutions
- Universidad de Jaén (ES)
- Minjiang University (CN)
- Shandong Youth University of Political Science (CN)
- Fuzhou University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Mathematics
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/math13071182
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.11
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province