Hesitant Fuzzy Consensus Reaching Process for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Methods

The emergence and popularity of social media have made large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problems increasingly common, resulting in significant research interest in this field. LSGDM involves numerous evaluators, which can lead to disagreements and hesitancy among them. Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) become crucial in this context as they capture the uncertainty and hesitancy among evaluators. On the other hand, research on the Consensus Reaching Process (CRP) becomes particularly important in dealing with the inevitable differences among the great number of evaluators. Ways to mitigate these differences to reach an agreement are a crucial area of study. For this reason, this paper presents a new CRP model to deal with LSGDM problems in hesitant fuzzy environments. First, HFSs and Normal-type Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (N-HFSs) are introduced to integrate evaluators’ subgroup and collective opinions, aiming to preserve as much decision information as possible while reducing computational complexity. Subsequently, a CRP with a detailed feedback suggestion generation mechanism is developed, which considers the willingness of evaluators to modify their opinions, thereby improving the effectiveness of reaching an agreement. Finally, a LSGDM framework that does not require any normalization process is proposed, and its feasibility and robustness are demonstrated through a numerical example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math13071182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hesitant Fuzzy Consensus Reaching Process for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Methods

Ying-Ming Wang, Meng-Jun Meng, Wei Liang, Rosa M. Rodríguez et al.
1 citations
Mathematics
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

Hesitant Fuzzy Consensus Reaching Process for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Methods

Ying-Ming Wang, Meng-Jun Meng, Wei Liang, Rosa M. Rodríguez, Álvaro Labella
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The emergence and popularity of social media have made large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problems increasingly common, resulting in significant research interest in this field. LSGDM involves numerous evaluators, which can lead to disagreements and hesitancy among them. Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) become crucial in this context as they capture the uncertainty and hesitancy among evaluators. On the other hand, research on the Consensus Reaching Process (CRP) becomes particularly important in dealing with the inevitable differences among the great number of evaluators. Ways to mitigate these differences to reach an agreement are a crucial area of study. For this reason, this paper presents a new CRP model to deal with LSGDM problems in hesitant fuzzy environments. First, HFSs and Normal-type Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (N-HFSs) are introduced to integrate evaluators’ subgroup and collective opinions, aiming to preserve as much decision information as possible while reducing computational complexity. Subsequently, a CRP with a detailed feedback suggestion generation mechanism is developed, which considers the willingness of evaluators to modify their opinions, thereby improving the effectiveness of reaching an agreement. Finally, a LSGDM framework that does not require any normalization process is proposed, and its feasibility and robustness are demonstrated through a numerical example.

MathematicsVol. 13(7)
Universidad de Jaén (ES), Minjiang University (CN), Shandong Youth University of Political Science (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.