Use of integrated genomic surveillance by local public health authorities: Recommendations based on a mixed-methods study of current adoption, applications and success factors, Germany, 2023

BackgroundIntegrated genomic surveillance (IGS), i.e. the integrated analysis of pathogen whole genome sequencing and classical epidemiological data, can contribute substantially to the disease surveillance and infection prevention activities of local public health authorities (LPHAs).AimOur aim was to characterise how LPHAs use IGS, and factors required or important for their implementation, in the context of the German public health system.MethodsWe employed a mixed-methods design combining a quantitative survey of 60 LPHAs in three German states with five qualitative case studies based on LPHAs in four German localities and one state-level public health authority.ResultsApproximately half of LPHAs reported adoption of IGS; applications included outbreak analysis (n = 25), targeting and evaluation of infection control measures (n = 25 and n = 18, respectively) and characterisation of pathogen transmission chains (n = 25). Factors identified as required or important for the implementation of IGS in LPHAs included fast sample-to-result turnaround times, organisational data interpretation capabilities and clearly defined surveillance sampling strategies. Based on the case studies in which the adoption of IGS was successful, we formulate recommendations for implementing IGS at the level of LPHAs, including establishment of dedicated IGS analysis teams within LPHAs, use of user-friendly digital solutions (e.g. browser-based dashboards) for data exchange and analysis, and implementation of IGS in collaboration with local academic institutions.ConclusionOur analysis paves the way for increasing the implementation of IGS by LPHAs in Germany and other countries with similarly structured public health systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurosurveillance
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2025.30.13.2400508
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of integrated genomic surveillance by local public health authorities: Recommendations based on a mixed-methods study of current adoption, applications and success factors, Germany, 2023

Masyar Monazahian, Christian Drosten, Adam Grundhoff, Pascal Kreuzer et al.
4 citations
Eurosurveillance
Zoonotic diseases and public health
7.51
article

Use of integrated genomic surveillance by local public health authorities: Recommendations based on a mixed-methods study of current adoption, applications and success factors, Germany, 2023

Masyar Monazahian, Christian Drosten, Adam Grundhoff, Pascal Kreuzer, Daniel Schmitt, Simone Scheithauer, Alexander Dilthey, Hajo Grundmann, Claudia Hornberg, Andrew Jack, Anna Bludau, Lutz Ehlkes, Sandra Reuter, Johannes Dreesman, Richard Egelkamp, Nicole Fischer, Inga Overesch, Markus Tröger, Jonas Weber, Fabian Feil, Alexandra von Reiswitz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

BackgroundIntegrated genomic surveillance (IGS), i.e. the integrated analysis of pathogen whole genome sequencing and classical epidemiological data, can contribute substantially to the disease surveillance and infection prevention activities of local public health authorities (LPHAs).AimOur aim was to characterise how LPHAs use IGS, and factors required or important for their implementation, in the context of the German public health system.MethodsWe employed a mixed-methods design combining a quantitative survey of 60 LPHAs in three German states with five qualitative case studies based on LPHAs in four German localities and one state-level public health authority.ResultsApproximately half of LPHAs reported adoption of IGS; applications included outbreak analysis (n = 25), targeting and evaluation of infection control measures (n = 25 and n = 18, respectively) and characterisation of pathogen transmission chains (n = 25). Factors identified as required or important for the implementation of IGS in LPHAs included fast sample-to-result turnaround times, organisational data interpretation capabilities and clearly defined surveillance sampling strategies. Based on the case studies in which the adoption of IGS was successful, we formulate recommendations for implementing IGS at the level of LPHAs, including establishment of dedicated IGS analysis teams within LPHAs, use of user-friendly digital solutions (e.g. browser-based dashboards) for data exchange and analysis, and implementation of IGS in collaboration with local academic institutions.ConclusionOur analysis paves the way for increasing the implementation of IGS by LPHAs in Germany and other countries with similarly structured public health systems.

EurosurveillanceVol. 30(13)
Leibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Freiburg (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Gesundheitsamt (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
7.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.