Gender Differences in Objective and Subjective Social Isolation and Self-Reported Hypertension in Older Adults

Hypertension is a major public health concern, especially in older adults, and gender differences are a factor in terms of its prevalence. Social connections benefit health, while social isolation is linked to negative outcomes. Prior studies suggest social isolation and connectedness vary by gender, but few have explored this relationship with hypertension. This study examined gender differences in the association between social isolation and hypertension in older adults using data from the National Survey of American Life (1280 adults aged ≥55). Weighted logistic regressions tested gender differences in objective and subjective social isolation and hypertension. Both men and women who were objectively isolated from family and friends, or only friends, were less likely to have hypertension than those not isolated. However, when accounting for subjective isolation, only isolation from family predicted hypertension. Gender moderated this relationship-men isolated from family and friends had a higher likelihood of hypertension, while no such association was found for women. Findings suggest that preventing objective isolation, particularly from family, may help reduce hypertension risk in older adults. This study highlights the need to further investigate social isolation's impact on health and its underlying mechanisms among older adults in the U.S.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12040136
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in Objective and Subjective Social Isolation and Self-Reported Hypertension in Older Adults

Ann W. Nguyen, Tyrone Hamler, Harry Owen Taylor, Weidi Qin et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
article

Gender Differences in Objective and Subjective Social Isolation and Self-Reported Hypertension in Older Adults

Ann W. Nguyen, Tyrone Hamler, Harry Owen Taylor, Weidi Qin, Fei Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hypertension is a major public health concern, especially in older adults, and gender differences are a factor in terms of its prevalence. Social connections benefit health, while social isolation is linked to negative outcomes. Prior studies suggest social isolation and connectedness vary by gender, but few have explored this relationship with hypertension. This study examined gender differences in the association between social isolation and hypertension in older adults using data from the National Survey of American Life (1280 adults aged ≥55). Weighted logistic regressions tested gender differences in objective and subjective social isolation and hypertension. Both men and women who were objectively isolated from family and friends, or only friends, were less likely to have hypertension than those not isolated. However, when accounting for subjective isolation, only isolation from family predicted hypertension. Gender moderated this relationship-men isolated from family and friends had a higher likelihood of hypertension, while no such association was found for women. Findings suggest that preventing objective isolation, particularly from family, may help reduce hypertension risk in older adults. This study highlights the need to further investigate social isolation's impact on health and its underlying mechanisms among older adults in the U.S.

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and DiseaseVol. 12(4)
University of Denver (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Toronto (CA), Knoxville College (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
National Institute on Aging
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.