Strategies to Suppress Polysulfide Dissolution and Its Effects on Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs), with a high energy density (2600 Wh kg−1) and theoretical specific capacity (1672 mA h g−1), are considered the most promising next-generation rechargeable energy storage devices. However, polysulfide dissolution and the shuttle effect cause severe capacity fading and the rapid loss of the active material; hence, these must be addressed first. This review provides an overview of various strategies employed to immobilise polysulfides via polysulfide trapping and physical and chemical adsorption using porous cathode designs, heterostructures, functionalised separators, and polymer binders. The working mechanism of each strategy is reviewed and discussed, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages, and they are analysed through comparisons of the battery performance and limitations in terms of practical applications. Finally, the future prospects for the design and synthesis of LSBs to limit polysulfide dissolution are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11040139
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies to Suppress Polysulfide Dissolution and Its Effects on Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Grace P.Y. Cheung, Chun Huang
5 citations
Batteries
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
3.65
article

Strategies to Suppress Polysulfide Dissolution and Its Effects on Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Grace P.Y. Cheung, Chun Huang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs), with a high energy density (2600 Wh kg−1) and theoretical specific capacity (1672 mA h g−1), are considered the most promising next-generation rechargeable energy storage devices. However, polysulfide dissolution and the shuttle effect cause severe capacity fading and the rapid loss of the active material; hence, these must be addressed first. This review provides an overview of various strategies employed to immobilise polysulfides via polysulfide trapping and physical and chemical adsorption using porous cathode designs, heterostructures, functionalised separators, and polymer binders. The working mechanism of each strategy is reviewed and discussed, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages, and they are analysed through comparisons of the battery performance and limitations in terms of practical applications. Finally, the future prospects for the design and synthesis of LSBs to limit polysulfide dissolution are discussed.

BatteriesVol. 11(4)
Research Complex at Harwell (GB), The Faraday Institution (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Faraday Institution, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies to Suppress Polysulfide Dissolution and Its Effects on Lithium–Sulfur Batteries — Grace P.Y. Cheung, Chun Huang · Batteries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS