Appropriating the Historical Other: Utilizing Ancient Heresy in the Struggle over Gender Dominance at the Turn of the Twentieth Century

Abstract This article studies references to Gnosticism in debates regarding gender at the turn of the twentieth century. Analyzing an array of sources, from activists for female empowerment in British Theosophy to continental traditionalist conservatives, the article shows that Gnosticism and ancient Gnostics were referenced to support both female liberation as well as male dominance. It is argued that this was made possible by (1) the polemical and contradictory state of the ancient second-hand sources regarding “Gnostic” views of the nature of male- and femaleness combined (2) with a key component constituting the reception of Gnosticism in modernity: counterculture and the reevaluation of the religious “other.” It is concluded that a core feature of the modern revival and reception of Gnosticism is a particular form of alterity: the reevaluation of historical othering processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Numen
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-07223001
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appropriating the Historical Other: Utilizing Ancient Heresy in the Struggle over Gender Dominance at the Turn of the Twentieth Century

Paul Linjamaa
Numen
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Appropriating the Historical Other: Utilizing Ancient Heresy in the Struggle over Gender Dominance at the Turn of the Twentieth Century

Paul Linjamaa
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article studies references to Gnosticism in debates regarding gender at the turn of the twentieth century. Analyzing an array of sources, from activists for female empowerment in British Theosophy to continental traditionalist conservatives, the article shows that Gnosticism and ancient Gnostics were referenced to support both female liberation as well as male dominance. It is argued that this was made possible by (1) the polemical and contradictory state of the ancient second-hand sources regarding “Gnostic” views of the nature of male- and femaleness combined (2) with a key component constituting the reception of Gnosticism in modernity: counterculture and the reevaluation of the religious “other.” It is concluded that a core feature of the modern revival and reception of Gnosticism is a particular form of alterity: the reevaluation of historical othering processes.

NumenVol. 72(2-3)
Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.