Multi‐year evaluation of rearing techniques for three sexually propagated Caribbean corals in a restoration setting

In response to declining coral populations worldwide, conservation groups are increasingly applying restoration strategies to bolster abundance and diversity, including sexual propagation of corals. Collection and fertilization of coral gametes as well as larval rearing and settlement have been successful. However, post‐settlement stages remain a bottleneck (80–100% mortality), which makes this technique costly to implement at scale. To address this challenge, we compared the survival and colony size of three sexually propagated Caribbean coral species, Diploria labyrinthiformis , Pseudodiploria strigosa , and Orbicella faveolata , reared at three levels of investment: direct outplant to reef, in situ field nursery rearing, and ex situ aquaculture facility rearing. As part of coral sexual propagation work in St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands, recruits were reared for 1 year before being outplanted to reef plots and were monitored annually for three subsequent years. The cost‐effectiveness of each rearing strategy was calculated at each monitoring time point via coral seeding unit yield and cost per seeding unit. Although survival was low at 4 years (0–1.8%), corals reared in the in situ nursery displayed significantly higher survival and therefore lower cost per seeding unit than the other two investment strategies. These results highlight the benefits of an in situ nursery stage to increase long‐term juvenile survival and cost‐effectiveness. The return on investment of corals reared in the in situ nursery suggests that outplanting sexually propagated corals may be a viable restoration strategy; however, the low proportion of corals surviving at 4 years highlights current limitations when outplanting on degraded reefs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70039
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐year evaluation of rearing techniques for three sexually propagated Caribbean corals in a restoration setting

Linda Wegley Kelly, Ashlee Lillis, Sophie Cook, Emily N. Nixon et al.
3 citations
Restoration Ecology
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
5.15
article

Multi‐year evaluation of rearing techniques for three sexually propagated Caribbean corals in a restoration setting

Linda Wegley Kelly, Ashlee Lillis, Sophie Cook, Emily N. Nixon, Alexandra N. Gutting
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In response to declining coral populations worldwide, conservation groups are increasingly applying restoration strategies to bolster abundance and diversity, including sexual propagation of corals. Collection and fertilization of coral gametes as well as larval rearing and settlement have been successful. However, post‐settlement stages remain a bottleneck (80–100% mortality), which makes this technique costly to implement at scale. To address this challenge, we compared the survival and colony size of three sexually propagated Caribbean coral species, Diploria labyrinthiformis , Pseudodiploria strigosa , and Orbicella faveolata , reared at three levels of investment: direct outplant to reef, in situ field nursery rearing, and ex situ aquaculture facility rearing. As part of coral sexual propagation work in St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands, recruits were reared for 1 year before being outplanted to reef plots and were monitored annually for three subsequent years. The cost‐effectiveness of each rearing strategy was calculated at each monitoring time point via coral seeding unit yield and cost per seeding unit. Although survival was low at 4 years (0–1.8%), corals reared in the in situ nursery displayed significantly higher survival and therefore lower cost per seeding unit than the other two investment strategies. These results highlight the benefits of an in situ nursery stage to increase long‐term juvenile survival and cost‐effectiveness. The return on investment of corals reared in the in situ nursery suggests that outplanting sexually propagated corals may be a viable restoration strategy; however, the low proportion of corals surviving at 4 years highlights current limitations when outplanting on degraded reefs.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(4)
The Nature Conservancy (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of the Virgin Islands (VI), United States Virgin Islands Department of Health (VI)
National Science Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.