The Class Dynamics of Ocean Grabbing: Who Are the ‘Fisher Peoples’?

ABSTRACT Amidst processes of (uneven) dispossession and displacement of coastal populations—often termed ‘ocean grabbing’—scholar‐activists, NGOs and the leadership of different social movements invoke, so‐called, ‘fisher people’ as the political subjects of resistance. These ‘fisher people’ are often cast as capital's other as part of a normative and moral critique of ocean grabbing and purportedly the agents of change towards ‘blue justice’. Arguing for the importance of analytically differentiating within and between both classes of capital and classes of labour, this intervention draws on a seemingly clear‐cut case of violent ocean grabbing in Southern Myanmar to question prevalent assumptions around undifferentiated ‘fisher peoples’. The intervention argues that the literatures on ocean grabbing and blue (in)justice could usefully draw from the conceptual tools of Marxist agrarian political economy to better analyse concrete social relations of production and reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agrarian Change
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.70011
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Class Dynamics of Ocean Grabbing: Who Are the ‘Fisher Peoples’?

Mads Barbesgaard
5 citations
Journal of Agrarian Change
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
24.16
article

The Class Dynamics of Ocean Grabbing: Who Are the ‘Fisher Peoples’?

Mads Barbesgaard
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amidst processes of (uneven) dispossession and displacement of coastal populations—often termed ‘ocean grabbing’—scholar‐activists, NGOs and the leadership of different social movements invoke, so‐called, ‘fisher people’ as the political subjects of resistance. These ‘fisher people’ are often cast as capital's other as part of a normative and moral critique of ocean grabbing and purportedly the agents of change towards ‘blue justice’. Arguing for the importance of analytically differentiating within and between both classes of capital and classes of labour, this intervention draws on a seemingly clear‐cut case of violent ocean grabbing in Southern Myanmar to question prevalent assumptions around undifferentiated ‘fisher peoples’. The intervention argues that the literatures on ocean grabbing and blue (in)justice could usefully draw from the conceptual tools of Marxist agrarian political economy to better analyse concrete social relations of production and reproduction.

Journal of Agrarian ChangeVol. 25(3)
Lund University (SE)
Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
24.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.