Liquidity and bank risk-taking in the MENA region

This paper examines the effect of liquidity on bank risk-taking in the MENA region during the period 2005-2017. Using a fixed effects model with panel-corrected standard error, we found that funding liquidity, liquidity risk, and bank activities significantly influence the banks' risk-taking behaviour. However, the effect varies with risk-taking proxies and the size of banks. While the results for funding liquidity and risk-taking using the standard deviation of return on asset revealed insignificant, using the z-score, the results revealed a significant effect. Nonetheless, both the results for liquidity risk and bank activities are significant. This result entails that liquidity and bank risk-taking behaviour differ with countries' peculiarities. Thus, liquidity regulation should be implemented with the consideration of other region and their peculiarities. Furthermore, this study provides additional insight from a region with distinct peculiarities and challenges with liquidity management tools using additional risk-taking proxies and alternative methods of analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Services and Operations Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsom.2025.145542
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liquidity and bank risk-taking in the MENA region

Sallahuddin Hassan, Shamsul Bahrain Mohamed Arshad, Salihu Liman Mairafi
International Journal of Services and Operations Management
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Liquidity and bank risk-taking in the MENA region

Sallahuddin Hassan, Shamsul Bahrain Mohamed Arshad, Salihu Liman Mairafi
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of liquidity on bank risk-taking in the MENA region during the period 2005-2017. Using a fixed effects model with panel-corrected standard error, we found that funding liquidity, liquidity risk, and bank activities significantly influence the banks' risk-taking behaviour. However, the effect varies with risk-taking proxies and the size of banks. While the results for funding liquidity and risk-taking using the standard deviation of return on asset revealed insignificant, using the z-score, the results revealed a significant effect. Nonetheless, both the results for liquidity risk and bank activities are significant. This result entails that liquidity and bank risk-taking behaviour differ with countries' peculiarities. Thus, liquidity regulation should be implemented with the consideration of other region and their peculiarities. Furthermore, this study provides additional insight from a region with distinct peculiarities and challenges with liquidity management tools using additional risk-taking proxies and alternative methods of analysis.

International Journal of Services and Operations ManagementVol. 50(4)
Nasarawa State University (NG), Northern University of Malaysia (MY)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Liquidity and bank risk-taking in the MENA region — Sallahuddin Hassan, Shamsul Bahrain Mohamed Arshad, et al. · International Journal of Services and Operations Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS